» Articles » PMID: 35852017

Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Causal Effects with Interference: A Simulation Study

Overview
Journal Stat Med
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Public Health
Date 2022 Jul 19
PMID 35852017
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Interference, the dependency of an individual's potential outcome on the exposure of other individuals, is a common occurrence in medicine and public health. Recently, targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) has been extended to settings of interference, including in the context of estimation of the mean of an outcome under a specified distribution of exposure, referred to as a policy. This paper summarizes how TMLE for independent data is extended to general interference (network-TMLE). An extensive simulation study is presented of network-TMLE, consisting of four data generating mechanisms (unit-treatment effect only, spillover effects only, unit-treatment and spillover effects, infection transmission) in networks of varying structures. Simulations show that network-TMLE performs well across scenarios with interference, but issues manifest when policies are not well-supported by the observed data, potentially leading to poor confidence interval coverage. Guidance for practical application, freely available software, and areas of future work are provided.

References
1.
Edwards J, Cole S, Lesko C, Mathews W, Moore R, Mugavero M . An Illustration of Inverse Probability Weighting to Estimate Policy-Relevant Causal Effects. Am J Epidemiol. 2016; 184(4):336-44. PMC: 4983650. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwv339. View

2.
Clark A, Wilder C, Winstanley E . A systematic review of community opioid overdose prevention and naloxone distribution programs. J Addict Med. 2014; 8(3):153-63. DOI: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000034. View

3.
Christakis N, Fowler J . The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(4):370-9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa066082. View

4.
Balzer L, Petersen M, van der Laan M . Targeted estimation and inference for the sample average treatment effect in trials with and without pair-matching. Stat Med. 2016; 35(21):3717-32. PMC: 4965321. DOI: 10.1002/sim.6965. View

5.
Jarvis M, Feyerabend C, Bryant A, Hedges B, Primatesta P . Passive smoking in the home: plasma cotinine concentrations in non-smokers with smoking partners. Tob Control. 2001; 10(4):368-74. PMC: 1747624. DOI: 10.1136/tc.10.4.368. View