» Articles » PMID: 35851944

Super-resolution Segmentation Network for Reconstruction of Packed Neurites

Overview
Date 2022 Jul 19
PMID 35851944
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Neuron reconstruction can provide the quantitative data required for measuring the neuronal morphology and is crucial in brain research. However, the difficulty in reconstructing dense neurites, wherein massive labor is required for accurate reconstruction in most cases, has not been well resolved. In this work, we provide a new pathway for solving this challenge by proposing the super-resolution segmentation network (SRSNet), which builds the mapping of the neurites in the original neuronal images and their segmentation in a higher-resolution (HR) space. During the segmentation process, the distances between the boundaries of the packed neurites are enlarged, and only the central parts of the neurites are segmented. Owing to this strategy, the super-resolution segmented images are produced for subsequent reconstruction. We carried out experiments on neuronal images with a voxel size of 0.2 μm × 0.2 μm × 1 μm produced by fMOST. SRSNet achieves an average F1 score of 0.88 for automatic packed neurites reconstruction, which takes both the precision and recall values into account, while the average F1 scores of other state-of-the-art automatic tracing methods are less than 0.70.

Citing Articles

A hierarchically annotated dataset drives tangled filament recognition in digital neuron reconstruction.

Chen W, Liao M, Bao S, An S, Li W, Liu X Patterns (N Y). 2024; 5(8):101007.

PMID: 39233689 PMC: 11368685. DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2024.101007.


NeurostimML: a machine learning model for predicting neurostimulation-induced tissue damage.

Li Y, Frederick R, George D, Cogan S, Pancrazio J, Bleris L J Neural Eng. 2024; 21(3).

PMID: 38885676 PMC: 11641559. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ad593e.


NeurostimML: A machine learning model for predicting neurostimulation-induced tissue damage.

Li Y, Frederick R, George D, Cogan S, Pancrazio J, Bleris L bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 37905012 PMC: 10614958. DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.18.562980.


Neuron tracing from light microscopy images: automation, deep learning and bench testing.

Liu Y, Wang G, Ascoli G, Zhou J, Liu L Bioinformatics. 2022; 38(24):5329-5339.

PMID: 36303315 PMC: 9750132. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac712.

References
1.
Cai R, Pan C, Ghasemigharagoz A, Todorov M, Forstera B, Zhao S . Panoptic imaging of transparent mice reveals whole-body neuronal projections and skull-meninges connections. Nat Neurosci. 2019; 22(2):317-327. PMC: 6494982. DOI: 10.1038/s41593-018-0301-3. View

2.
De J, Cheng L, Zhang X, Lin F, Li H, Ong K . A Graph-Theoretical Approach for Tracing Filamentary Structures in Neuronal and Retinal Images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015; 35(1):257-72. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2015.2465962. View

3.
Donohue D, Ascoli G . Automated reconstruction of neuronal morphology: an overview. Brain Res Rev. 2010; 67(1-2):94-102. PMC: 3086984. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.11.003. View

4.
Economo M, Clack N, Lavis L, Gerfen C, Svoboda K, Myers E . A platform for brain-wide imaging and reconstruction of individual neurons. Elife. 2016; 5:e10566. PMC: 4739768. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.10566. View

5.
Helmstaedter M . Cellular-resolution connectomics: challenges of dense neural circuit reconstruction. Nat Methods. 2013; 10(6):501-7. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2476. View