» Articles » PMID: 35851099

Low Intensity Stimulation of Aortic Baroreceptor Afferent Fibers As a Potential Therapeutic Alternative for Hypertension Treatment

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2022 Jul 19
PMID 35851099
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Carotid baroreceptor stimulation has been clinically explored for antihypertensive benefits, but neuromodulation of aortic baroreceptor afferents remains unexplored for potential translation into the clinic. Published studies have used supramaximal stimulations, which are unphysiological and energy inefficient. The objective of the present study was to identify optimal low-charge nerve stimulation parameters that would provide a clinically-relevant (20-30 mmHg) decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP) in anesthetized spontaneously hypertensive rats. Stimulations of 20 s were delivered to the left aortic depressor nerve (ADN) of these rats using low ranges of pulse amplitudes (≤ 0.6 mA), widths (≤ 0.5 ms) and frequencies (≤ 5 Hz). We also assessed the effects of continuous (20 s) versus intermittent (5 s ON/3 s OFF and 5 s ON/3 s OFF for 20 s) stimulation on MAP, heart rate (HR), mesenteric (MVR) and femoral (FVR) vascular resistance using low (5 Hz) and high (15 Hz) frequencies. Lower pulse amplitudes (0.2 mA) produced 9 ± 2 to 18 ± 2 mmHg decreases in MAP. Higher pulse amplitudes (0.4 mA) produced a median MAP reduction of 28 ± 4 mmHg at 0.2 ms and 5 Hz, with no added benefit seen above 0.4 mA. Continuous and intermittent low frequency stimulation at 0.4 mA and 0.2 ms produced similar sustained decreases in MAP, HR, MVR and FVR. Continuous high frequency stimulation at 0.4 mA and 0.2 ms produced larger reductions in MAP, HR, MVR and FVR compared with all low frequency and/or intermittent high frequency stimulations. We conclude from these findings that "low intensity intermittent" electrical stimulation is an effective alternate way for neuromodulation of the aortic baroreceptor afferents and to evoke a required restoration of MAP levels in spontaneously hypertensive rats. This approach enables low energy consumption and markedly lowers the excessive decreases in MAP and hemodynamic disturbances elicited by continuous high-charge injection protocols.

Citing Articles

Low-level neurostimulation of the renal nerves as a potential therapeutic strategy for hypertension treatment.

Salman I, Ameer O, Hassan S, Sridhar A, Hsieh Y, Lewis S Front Pharmacol. 2025; 16:1529844.

PMID: 40078273 PMC: 11897555. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1529844.


The Clinical Significance and Application of Heart Rate Variability in Dialysis Patients: A Narrative Review.

Jhen R, Wang P, Chang Y, Kao J, Wu E, Shiao C Biomedicines. 2024; 12(7).

PMID: 39062120 PMC: 11275182. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12071547.


Key challenges in exploring the rat as a preclinical neurostimulation model for aortic baroreflex modulation in hypertension.

Salman I Hypertens Res. 2023; 47(2):399-415.

PMID: 37919429 DOI: 10.1038/s41440-023-01486-6.


Differential frequency-dependent reflex summation of the aortic baroreceptor afferent input.

Salman I Pflugers Arch. 2023; 475(8):933-944.

PMID: 37219603 DOI: 10.1007/s00424-023-02820-0.


Laterality Influences Central Integration of Baroreceptor Afferent Input in Male and Female Sprague Dawley Rats.

Salman I, Ameer O, McMurray S, Giarola A, Sridhar A, Lewis S Front Physiol. 2020; 11:499.

PMID: 32536876 PMC: 7269127. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00499.

References
1.
Domingos-Souza G, Santos-Almeida F, Meschiari C, Ferreira N, Pereira C, Pestana-Oliveira N . The ability of baroreflex activation to improve blood pressure and resistance vessel function in spontaneously hypertensive rats is dependent on stimulation parameters. Hypertens Res. 2021; 44(8):932-940. DOI: 10.1038/s41440-021-00639-9. View

2.
Scheffers I, Kroon A, Schmidli J, Jordan J, Tordoir J, Mohaupt M . Novel baroreflex activation therapy in resistant hypertension: results of a European multi-center feasibility study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 56(15):1254-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.089. View

3.
Heusser K, Tank J, Brinkmann J, Menne J, Kaufeld J, Linnenweber-Held S . Acute Response to Unilateral Unipolar Electrical Carotid Sinus Stimulation in Patients With Resistant Arterial Hypertension. Hypertension. 2016; 67(3):585-91. PMC: 4773922. DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06486. View

4.
Bencze M, Behuliak M, Zicha J . The impact of four different classes of anesthetics on the mechanisms of blood pressure regulation in normotensive and spontaneously hypertensive rats. Physiol Res. 2013; 62(5):471-8. DOI: 10.33549/physiolres.932637. View

5.
Glick G, Covell J . Relative importance of the carotid and aortic baroreceptors in the reflex control of heart rate. Am J Physiol. 1968; 214(5):955-61. DOI: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1968.214.5.955. View