» Articles » PMID: 35848703

Convolutional Neural Network-based Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis of Early Esophageal Cancer Based on Endoscopic Images: A Meta-analysis

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2022 Jul 18
PMID 35848703
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Early screening and treatment of esophageal cancer (EC) is particularly important for the survival and prognosis of patients. However, early EC is difficult to diagnose by a routine endoscopic examination. Therefore, convolutional neural network (CNN)-based artificial intelligence (AI) has become a very promising method in the diagnosis of early EC using endoscopic images. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CNN-based AI for detecting early EC based on endoscopic images.

Methods: A comprehensive search was performed to identify relevant English articles concerning CNN-based AI in the diagnosis of early EC based on endoscopic images (from the date of database establishment to April 2022). The pooled sensitivity (SEN), pooled specificity (SPE), positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI), summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve, and area under the curve (AUC) for the accuracy of CNN-based AI in the diagnosis of early EC based on endoscopic images were calculated. We used the I test to assess heterogeneity and investigated the source of heterogeneity by performing meta-regression analysis. Publication bias was assessed using Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test.

Results: Seven studies met the eligibility criteria. The SEN and SPE were 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.82-0.94) and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.79-0.96), respectively. The LR+ of the malignant ultrasonic features was 9.8 (95% CI: 3.8-24.8) and the LR- was 0.11 (95% CI: 0.06-0.21), revealing that CNN-based AI exhibited an excellent ability to confirm or exclude early EC on endoscopic images. Additionally, SROC curves showed that the AUC of the CNN-based AI in the diagnosis of early EC based on endoscopic images was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97), demonstrating that CNN-based AI has good diagnostic value for early EC based on endoscopic images.

Conclusions: Based on our meta-analysis, CNN-based AI is an excellent diagnostic tool with high sensitivity, specificity, and AUC in the diagnosis of early EC based on endoscopic images.

Citing Articles

Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy: Umbrella Review.

Zha B, Cai A, Wang G JMIR Med Inform. 2024; 12:e56361.

PMID: 39093715 PMC: 11296324. DOI: 10.2196/56361.


Identification of runner fatigue stages based on inertial sensors and deep learning.

Chang P, Wang C, Chen Y, Wang G, Lu A Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 11:1302911.

PMID: 38047289 PMC: 10691589. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1302911.


The Advent of Domain Adaptation into Artificial Intelligence for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Medical Imaging.

Kim M, Kim S, Kim S, Nam J, Hwang Y, Lim Y Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(19).

PMID: 37835766 PMC: 10572560. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13193023.


The Saudi Gastroenterology Association guidelines for quality indicators in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures.

Alsohaibani F, Aljohany H, Almakadma A, Hamed A, Alkhiari R, Aljahdli E Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2023; 29(3):148-157.

PMID: 36891939 PMC: 10358793. DOI: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_391_22.

References
1.
Rasouli P, Moghadam A, Eslami P, Aghajanpoor Pasha M, Aghdaei H, Mehrvar A . The role of artificial intelligence in colon polyps detection. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2020; 13(3):191-199. PMC: 7417492. View

2.
Liu X, Wu W, Zhang S, Tan W, Qiu Y, Liao K . Effect of miR-630 expression on esophageal cancer cell invasion and migration. J Clin Lab Anal. 2021; 35(6):e23815. PMC: 8183945. DOI: 10.1002/jcla.23815. View

3.
Cai S, Li B, Tan W, Niu X, Yu H, Yao L . Using a deep learning system in endoscopy for screening of early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2019; 90(5):745-753.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.06.044. View

4.
Methley A, Campbell S, Chew-Graham C, McNally R, Cheraghi-Sohi S . PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14:579. PMC: 4310146. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-014-0579-0. View

5.
Xiao Z, Ji D, Li F, Li Z, Bao Z . Application of Artificial Intelligence in Early Gastric Cancer Diagnosis. Digestion. 2021; 103(1):69-75. DOI: 10.1159/000519601. View