» Articles » PMID: 35847114

Investigation on Potential ESKAPE Surrogates for 222 and 254 nm Irradiation Experiments

Overview
Journal Front Microbiol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2022 Jul 18
PMID 35847114
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Due to the increase in multidrug-resistant pathogens, it is important to investigate further antimicrobial options. In order not to have to work directly with pathogens, the investigation of possible surrogates is an important aspect. It is examined how suitable possible surrogate candidates for ESKAPE pathogens are for UVC applications. In addition, the inactivation sensitivities to 222 and 254 nm radiation are compared in relation.

Methods: Non-pathogenic members ( and ) of genera of ESKAPE strains were photoinactivated in PBS with irradiation wavelengths of 222 and 254 nm (no non-pathogenic was available). Log reduction doses were determined and compared to published photoinactivation results on ESKAPE pathogens. It was assumed that non-pathogenic bacteria could be designated as surrogates for one wavelength and one ESKAPE strain, if the doses were between the 25 and 75% quantiles of published log reduction dose of the corresponding pathogen.

Results: For all non-pathogen relatives (except ), higher average log reduction doses were required for irradiation at 222 nm than at 254 nm. Comparison by boxplot revealed that five of eight determined log reduction doses of the possible surrogates were within the 25 and 75% quantiles of the data for ESKAPE pathogens. The measured log reduction dose for non-pathogenic was above the 75% quantile at 222 nm, and the log reduction dose for was below the 25% quantile at 254 nm.

Conclusion: For more than half of the studied cases, the examined ESKAPE relatives in this study can be applied as surrogates for ESKAPE pathogens. Because of lack of data, no clear statement could be made for at 222 nm and at both wavelengths.

Citing Articles

Decontamination of Fused-Silica Surfaces by UVC Irradiation as Potential Application on Touchscreens.

Sicks B, Gurow O, Sommerfeld F, Hessling M Microorganisms. 2024; 12(10).

PMID: 39458408 PMC: 11510117. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12102099.


The Antibacterial Efficacy of Far-UVC Light: A Combined-Method Study Exploring the Effects of Experimental and Bacterial Variables on Dose-Response.

Griffin D, Gourlay T, Maclean M Pathogens. 2024; 13(8).

PMID: 39204298 PMC: 11357679. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens13080698.


Far-UVC Radiation for Disinfecting Hands or Gloves?.

Hessling M, Sicks B, Lau B Pathogens. 2023; 12(2).

PMID: 36839485 PMC: 9963788. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens12020213.

References
1.
Chang J, Ossoff S, Lobe D, Dorfman M, Dumais C, Qualls R . UV inactivation of pathogenic and indicator microorganisms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985; 49(6):1361-5. PMC: 241729. DOI: 10.1128/aem.49.6.1361-1365.1985. View

2.
POWERS J . Antimicrobial drug development--the past, the present, and the future. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004; 10 Suppl 4:23-31. DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-0691.2004.1007.x. View

3.
Gurtler J, Rivera R, Zhang H, Geveke D . Selection of surrogate bacteria in place of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella Typhimurium for pulsed electric field treatment of orange juice. Int J Food Microbiol. 2010; 139(1-2):1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.02.023. View

4.
Griffiths P, Babb J, Fraise A . Mycobacterium terrae: a potential surrogate for Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a standard disinfectant test. J Hosp Infect. 1998; 38(3):183-92. DOI: 10.1016/s0195-6701(98)90273-0. View

5.
Buonanno M, Ponnaiya B, Welch D, Stanislauskas M, Randers-Pehrson G, Smilenov L . Germicidal Efficacy and Mammalian Skin Safety of 222-nm UV Light. Radiat Res. 2017; 187(4):483-491. PMC: 5552051. DOI: 10.1667/RR0010CC.1. View