» Articles » PMID: 35846831

Rhinological Status of Patients with Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

Overview
Publisher Thieme
Date 2022 Jul 18
PMID 35846831
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

 Studying the state of the nasal cavity and its sinuses and the morphometric parameters of the inferior nasal conchae, as well as a comparative analysis of obtained values in patients with primary (PANDO) and secondary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (SALDO), is relevant.  To study the rhinological status of patients with PANDO) and SALDO).  The present study was based on the results of computed tomography (CT) dacryocystography in patients with PANDO (  = 45) and SALDO due to exposure to radioactive iodine (  = 14). The control group included CT images of paranasal sinuses in patients with no pathology (  = 49). Rhinological status according to the Newman and Lund-Mackay scales and volume of the inferior nasal conchae were assessed. Statistical processing included nonparametric statistics methods; χ Pearson test; and the Spearman rank correlation method.  The difference in values of the Newman and Lund-Mackay scales for the tested groups was significant. A significant difference in scores by the Newman scale was revealed when comparing the results of patients with SALDO and PANDO. Comparing the scores by the Lund-Mackay scale, a significant difference was found between the results of patients with SALDO and PANDO and between the results of patients with PANDO and the control group.  It was demonstrated that the rhinological status of patients with PANDO was worse than that of patients with SALDO and of subjects in the control group. No connection was found between the volume of the inferior nasal conchae and the development of lacrimal duct obstruction.

Citing Articles

Topographic and anatomical features of the nasolacrimal duct obstruction due to radioiodine treatment.

Yartsev V, Atkova E, Ekaterinchev M Int Ophthalmol. 2023; 43(9):3385-3390.

PMID: 37199817 DOI: 10.1007/s10792-023-02746-7.

References
1.
Paulsen F, Hallmann U, Paulsen J, Thale A . Innervation of the cavernous body of the human efferent tear ducts and function in tear outflow mechanism. J Anat. 2000; 197 ( Pt 2):177-87. PMC: 1468117. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2000.19720177.x. View

2.
Kallman J, Foster J, Wulc A, Yousem D, Kennedy D . Computed tomography in lacrimal outflow obstruction. Ophthalmology. 1997; 104(4):676-82. DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30252-8. View

3.
Dikici O, Ulutas H . Relationship Between Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction, Paranasal Abnormalities and Nasal Septal Deviation. J Craniofac Surg. 2020; 31(3):782-786. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006108. View

4.
Yee Kwan J, Su J, Huang S, Ghoraie L, Xu W, Chan B . Radiomic Biomarkers to Refine Risk Models for Distant Metastasis in HPV-related Oropharyngeal Carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018; 102(4):1107-1116. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.01.057. View

5.
Dinis P, Oliveira Matos T, Angelo P . Does sinusitis play a pathogenic role in primary acquired obstructive disease of the lachrymal system?. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012; 148(4):685-8. DOI: 10.1177/0194599812471615. View