» Articles » PMID: 35846567

Polymerases and DNA Repair in Neurons: Implications in Neuronal Survival and Neurodegenerative Diseases

Overview
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 2022 Jul 18
PMID 35846567
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Most of the neurodegenerative diseases and aging are associated with reactive oxygen species (ROS) or other intracellular damaging agents that challenge the genome integrity of the neurons. As most of the mature neurons stay in G0/G1 phase, replication-uncoupled DNA repair pathways including BER, NER, SSBR, and NHEJ, are pivotal, efficient, and economic mechanisms to maintain genomic stability without reactivating cell cycle. In these progresses, polymerases are prominent, not only because they are responsible for both sensing and repairing damages, but also for their more diversified roles depending on the cell cycle phase and damage types. In this review, we summarized recent knowledge on the structural and biochemical properties of distinct polymerases, including DNA and RNA polymerases, which are known to be expressed and active in nervous system; the biological relevance of these polymerases and their interactors with neuronal degeneration would be most graphically illustrated by the neurological abnormalities observed in patients with hereditary diseases associated with defects in DNA repair; furthermore, the vicious cycle of the trinucleotide repeat (TNR) and impaired DNA repair pathway is also discussed. Unraveling the mechanisms and contextual basis of the role of the polymerases in DNA damage response and repair will promote our understanding about how long-lived postmitotic cells cope with DNA lesions, and why disrupted DNA repair contributes to disease origin, despite the diversity of mutations in genes. This knowledge may lead to new insight into the development of targeted intervention for neurodegenerative diseases.

Citing Articles

Neuronal DNA repair reveals strategies to influence CRISPR editing outcomes.

Ramadoss G, Namaganda S, Hamilton J, Sharma R, Chow K, Macklin B bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38979269 PMC: 11230251. DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.25.600517.


Mutant huntingtin protein induces MLH1 degradation, DNA hyperexcision, and cGAS-STING-dependent apoptosis.

Sun X, Liu L, Wu C, Li X, Guo J, Zhang J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(13):e2313652121.

PMID: 38498709 PMC: 10990133. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2313652121.


Effect of Exercise and Oral Niacinamide Mononucleotide on Improving Mitochondrial Autophagy in Alzheimer's Disease.

Wu W, Yuan S, Tang Y, Meng X, Peng M, Hu Z Nutrients. 2023; 15(13).

PMID: 37447179 PMC: 10343931. DOI: 10.3390/nu15132851.


Replication dependent and independent mechanisms of GAA repeat instability.

Masnovo C, Lobo A, Mirkin S DNA Repair (Amst). 2022; 118:103385.

PMID: 35952488 PMC: 9675320. DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2022.103385.

References
1.
Damsma G, Cramer P . Molecular basis of transcriptional mutagenesis at 8-oxoguanine. J Biol Chem. 2009; 284(46):31658-63. PMC: 2797236. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M109.022764. View

2.
Plosky B, Samson L, Engelward B, Gold B, Schlaen B, Millas T . Base excision repair and nucleotide excision repair contribute to the removal of N-methylpurines from active genes. DNA Repair (Amst). 2003; 1(8):683-96. DOI: 10.1016/s1568-7864(02)00075-7. View

3.
Wang J, Clauson C, Robbins P, Niedernhofer L, Wang Y . The oxidative DNA lesions 8,5'-cyclopurines accumulate with aging in a tissue-specific manner. Aging Cell. 2012; 11(4):714-6. PMC: 3399950. DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2012.00828.x. View

4.
Nakazawa Y, Sasaki K, Mitsutake N, Matsuse M, Shimada M, Nardo T . Mutations in UVSSA cause UV-sensitive syndrome and impair RNA polymerase IIo processing in transcription-coupled nucleotide-excision repair. Nat Genet. 2012; 44(5):586-92. DOI: 10.1038/ng.2229. View

5.
Chiu A, Gehringer M, Braidy N, Guillemin G, Welch J, Neilan B . Excitotoxic potential of the cyanotoxin β-methyl-amino-L-alanine (BMAA) in primary human neurons. Toxicon. 2012; 60(6):1159-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2012.07.169. View