» Articles » PMID: 35846562

The Shape of μ-How Morphological Analyses Shape the Study of Microglia

Overview
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 2022 Jul 18
PMID 35846562
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Microglia, the innate immune cells of the CNS parenchyma, serve as the first line of defense in a myriad of neurodevelopmental, neurodegenerative, and neuroinflammatory conditions. In response to the peripheral inflammation, circulating mediators, and other external signals that are produced by these conditions, microglia dynamically employ different transcriptional programs as well as morphological adaptations to maintain homeostasis. To understand these cells' function, the field has established a number of essential analysis approaches, such as gene expression, cell quantification, and morphological reconstruction. Although high-throughput approaches are becoming commonplace in regard to other types of analyses (e.g., single-cell scRNA-seq), a similar standard for morphological reconstruction has yet to be established. In this review, we offer an overview of microglial morphological analysis methods, exploring the advantages and disadvantages of each, highlighting a number of key studies, and emphasizing how morphological analysis has significantly contributed to our understanding of microglial function in the CNS parenchyma. In doing so, we advocate for the use of unbiased, automated morphological reconstruction approaches in future studies, in order to capitalize on the valuable information embedded in the cellular structures microglia inhabit.

Citing Articles

Glioblastoma drives protease-independent extracellular matrix invasion of microglia.

Chang C, Bale A, Bhargava R, Harley B Mater Today Bio. 2025; 31:101475.

PMID: 39896278 PMC: 11787038. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101475.


Tracking changes in functionality and morphology of repopulated microglia in young and old mice.

Luczak-Sobotkowska Z, Rosa P, Lopez M, Ochocka N, Kiryk A, Lenkiewicz A J Neuroinflammation. 2024; 21(1):248.

PMID: 39363245 PMC: 11448401. DOI: 10.1186/s12974-024-03242-0.


PARK7/DJ-1 deficiency impairs microglial activation in response to LPS-induced inflammation.

Lind-Holm Mogensen F, Sousa C, Ameli C, Badanjak K, Pereira S, Muller A J Neuroinflammation. 2024; 21(1):174.

PMID: 39014482 PMC: 11253405. DOI: 10.1186/s12974-024-03164-x.


Using focused ultrasound to modulate microglial structure and function.

Grewal S, de Andrade E, Kofoed R, Matthews P, Aubert I, Tremblay M Front Cell Neurosci. 2024; 17:1290628.

PMID: 38164436 PMC: 10757935. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2023.1290628.


Assaying Microglia Functions In Vitro.

Maguire E, Connor-Robson N, Shaw B, ODonoghue R, Stoberl N, Hall-Roberts H Cells. 2022; 11(21).

PMID: 36359810 PMC: 9654693. DOI: 10.3390/cells11213414.

References
1.
Lowery R, Tremblay M, Hopkins B, Majewska A . The microglial fractalkine receptor is not required for activity-dependent plasticity in the mouse visual system. Glia. 2017; 65(11):1744-1761. PMC: 5657542. DOI: 10.1002/glia.23192. View

2.
Keren-Shaul H, Spinrad A, Weiner A, Matcovitch-Natan O, Dvir-Szternfeld R, Ulland T . A Unique Microglia Type Associated with Restricting Development of Alzheimer's Disease. Cell. 2017; 169(7):1276-1290.e17. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.018. View

3.
Bosco A, Romero C, Ambati B, Vetter M . In vivo dynamics of retinal microglial activation during neurodegeneration: confocal ophthalmoscopic imaging and cell morphometry in mouse glaucoma. J Vis Exp. 2015; (99):e52731. PMC: 4542682. DOI: 10.3791/52731. View

4.
Orlowski D, Soltys Z, Janeczko K . Morphological development of microglia in the postnatal rat brain. A quantitative study. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2003; 21(8):445-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2003.09.001. View

5.
Takehara H, Nagaoka A, Noguchi J, Akagi T, Kasai H, Ichiki T . Lab-on-a-brain: implantable micro-optical fluidic devices for neural cell analysis in vivo. Sci Rep. 2014; 4:6721. PMC: 4205880. DOI: 10.1038/srep06721. View