Bench to Bore Ramifications of Inter-subject Head Differences on RF Shimming and Specific Absorption Rates at 7T

Overview

Journal Magn Reson Imaging

Publisher Elsevier

Specialty Radiology

Date 2022 Jul 16

PMID 35842192

Authors

Benjamin M Hardy

Rana Banik

Xinqiang Yan

Adam W Anderson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: This study shows how inter-subject variation over a dataset of 72 head models results in specific absorption rate (SAR) and B field homogeneity differences using common shim scenarios.

Methods: MR-CT datasets were used to segment 71 head models into 10 tissue compartments. These head models were affixed to the shoulders and neck of the virtual family Duke model and placed within an 8 channel transmit surface-loop array to simulate the electromagnetic fields of a 7T imaging experiment. Radio frequency (RF) shimming using the Gerchberg-Saxton algorithm and Circularly Polarized shim weights over the entire brain and select slices of each model was simulated. Various SAR metrics and B maps were calculated to demonstrate the contribution of head variation to transmit inhomogeneity and SAR variability.

Results: With varying head geometries the loading for each transmit loop changes as evidenced by changes in S-parameters. The varying shim conditions and head geometries are shown to affect excitation uniformity, spatial distributions of local SAR, and SAR averaging over different pulse sequences. The Gerchberg-Saxton RF shimming algorithm outperforms circularly polarized shimming for all head models. Peak local SAR within the coil most often occurs nearest the coil on the periphery of the body. Shim conditions vary the spatial distribution of SAR.

Conclusion: The work gives further support to the need for fast and more subject specific SAR calculations to maintain safety. Local SAR is shown to vary spatially given shim conditions, subject geometry and composition, and position within the coil.

References

Collins C, Li S, Smith M . SAR and B1 field distributions in a heterogeneous human head model within a birdcage coil. Specific energy absorption rate. Magn Reson Med. 1998; 40(6):847-56. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910400610. View

Mao W, Smith M, Collins C . Exploring the limits of RF shimming for high-field MRI of the human head. Magn Reson Med. 2006; 56(4):918-22. PMC: 4040521. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21013. View

Hoyos-Idrobo A, Weiss P, Massire A, Amadon A, Boulant N . On variant strategies to solve the magnitude least squares optimization problem in parallel transmission pulse design and under strict SAR and power constraints. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2014; 33(3):739-48. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2013.2295465. View

Zhang B, Adriany G, DelaBarre L, Radder J, Lagore R, Rutt B . Effect of radiofrequency shield diameter on signal-to-noise ratio at ultra-high field MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2021; 85(6):3522-3530. PMC: 7904611. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28670. View

Sadeghi-Tarakameh A, Kazemivalipour E, Gundogdu U, Erdogan S, Atalar E . Accelerating the co-simulation method for the design of transmit array coils for MRI. MAGMA. 2020; 34(1):165-178. DOI: 10.1007/s10334-020-00858-0. View

de Buck M, Jezzard P, Jeong H, Hess A . An investigation into the minimum number of tissue groups required for 7T in-silico parallel transmit electromagnetic safety simulations in the human head. Magn Reson Med. 2020; 85(2):1114-1122. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28467. View

Collins C, Smith M . Spatial resolution of numerical models of man and calculated specific absorption rate using the FDTD method: a study at 64 MHz in a magnetic resonance imaging coil. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003; 18(3):383-8. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.10359. View

Massire A, Cloos M, Luong M, Amadon A, Vignaud A, Wiggins C . Thermal simulations in the human head for high field MRI using parallel transmission. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012; 35(6):1312-21. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23542. View

Restivo M, Raaijmakers A, van den Berg C, Luijten P, Hoogduin H . Improving peak local SAR prediction in parallel transmit using in situ S-matrix measurements. Magn Reson Med. 2016; 77(5):2040-2047. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26261. View

10.

Wolf S, Diehl D, Gebhardt M, Mallow J, Speck O . SAR simulations for high-field MRI: how much detail, effort, and accuracy is needed?. Magn Reson Med. 2012; 69(4):1157-68. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24329. View

11.

Avdievich N, Solomakha G, Ruhm L, Nikulin A, Magill A, Scheffler K . Folded-end dipole transceiver array for human whole-brain imaging at 7 T. NMR Biomed. 2021; 34(8):e4541. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4541. View

12.

de Greef M, Ipek O, Raaijmakers A, Crezee J, van den Berg C . Specific absorption rate intersubject variability in 7T parallel transmit MRI of the head. Magn Reson Med. 2012; 69(5):1476-85. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24378. View

13.

Kopanoglu E, Deniz C, Erturk M, Wise R . Specific absorption rate implications of within-scan patient head motion for ultra-high field MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2020; 84(5):2724-2738. PMC: 7396298. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28276. View

14.

Lakshmanan K, Cloos M, Brown R, Lattanzi R, Sodickson D, Wiggins G . The "Loopole" Antenna: A Hybrid Coil Combining Loop and Electric Dipole Properties for Ultra-High-Field MRI. Concepts Magn Reson Part B Magn Reson Eng. 2021; 2020. PMC: 8207246. DOI: 10.1155/2020/8886543. View

15.

Jiang W, Yang F, Wang K . Individualized and accurate SAR characterization method based on equivalent circuit model for MRI system. Magn Reson Med. 2022; 87(6):2997-3010. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29163. View

16.

Beqiri A, Hand J, Hajnal J, Malik S . Comparison between simulated decoupling regimes for specific absorption rate prediction in parallel transmit MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2014; 74(5):1423-34. PMC: 7613953. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25504. View

17.

Deniz C, Brown R, Lattanzi R, Alon L, Sodickson D, Zhu Y . Maximum efficiency radiofrequency shimming: Theory and initial application for hip imaging at 7 tesla. Magn Reson Med. 2012; 69(5):1379-88. PMC: 3478493. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24377. View

18.

Lattanzi R, Wiggins G, Zhang B, Duan Q, Brown R, Sodickson D . Approaching ultimate intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio with loop and dipole antennas. Magn Reson Med. 2017; 79(3):1789-1803. PMC: 5754268. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26803. View

19.

Li X, Pan J, Avdievich N, Hetherington H, Rispoli J . Electromagnetic simulation of a 16-channel head transceiver at 7 T using circuit-spatial optimization. Magn Reson Med. 2021; 85(6):3463-3478. PMC: 8124020. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28672. View

20.

Deniz C, Vaidya M, Sodickson D, Lattanzi R . Radiofrequency energy deposition and radiofrequency power requirements in parallel transmission with increasing distance from the coil to the sample. Magn Reson Med. 2015; 75(1):423-32. PMC: 4561044. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25646. View