» Articles » PMID: 35840766

Insight into the Hierarchical Control Governing Leg Stiffness During the Stance Phase of Running

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2022 Jul 15
PMID 35840766
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Leg stiffness plays a key role in the storage and release of elastic energy during stance. However, the extent to which a runner is able to reuse stored energy remains a limiting factor in determining their running effectiveness. In this study, ten habitual rearfoot strikers and ten habitual forefoot strikers were asked to run on a treadmill in three footwear conditions: traditional, neutral, and minimal running shoes. We examined the effect of habitual foot strike pattern and footwear on leg stiffness control within three task-relevant phases of stance (i.e. touch-down, loading, unloading). Control was quantified using stride-to-stride leg stiffness time-series and the coefficient of variability and detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA). The results are interpreted within a theoretical framework that blends dynamic systems theory and optimal feedback control. Results indicate that leg stiffness control is tightly regulated by an active control process during the loading period of stance. In contrast, the touch-down and unloading phases are driven mostly by passive allometric control mechanisms. The effect of footwear on leg stiffness control was inconclusive due to inconsistent trends across three shoe types. However, stiffness control was affected by landing technique. Habitual rearfoot strike runners have reduced DFA values during the touch-down and unloading phases. These sub-phases are associated with an allometric control process and suggests that rearfoot strike runners express a reduction in system complexity for leg stiffness control and hence, a less adaptable system.

Citing Articles

The effects of running shoe stack height on running style and stability during level running at different running speeds.

Kettner C, Stetter B, Stein T Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025; 13:1526752.

PMID: 40059889 PMC: 11885301. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1526752.


Assessing the effects of foot strike patterns and shoe types on the control of leg length and orientation in running.

Garofolini A, Mickle K, McLaughlin P, Taylor S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):2220.

PMID: 38278965 PMC: 10817954. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-52446-0.

References
1.
Almeida M, Davis I, Lopes A . Biomechanical Differences of Foot-Strike Patterns During Running: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015; 45(10):738-55. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2015.6019. View

2.
Valenzuela K, Lynn S, Mikelson L, Noffal G, Judelson D . Effect of Acute Alterations in Foot Strike Patterns during Running on Sagittal Plane Lower Limb Kinematics and Kinetics. J Sports Sci Med. 2015; 14(1):225-32. PMC: 4306776. View

3.
Leblanc M, Ferkranus H . Lower Extremity Joint Kinematics of Shod, Barefoot, and Simulated Barefoot Treadmill Running. Int J Exerc Sci. 2018; 11(1):717-729. PMC: 6033505. DOI: 10.70252/AJOU8254. View

4.
Shen Z, Seipel J . Effective leg stiffness of animal running and the co-optimization of energetic cost and stability. J Theor Biol. 2018; 451:57-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.04.020. View

5.
Shen Z, Seipel J . The leg stiffnesses animals use may improve the stability of locomotion. J Theor Biol. 2015; 377:66-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.04.010. View