» Articles » PMID: 35835940

Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests Reduce Delayed Diagnosis and Misdiagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2022 Jul 14
PMID 35835940
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The clinical impact of nucleic acid amplification (NAA) tests on reducing delayed diagnosis and misdiagnosis of pulmonary TB (PTB) has rarely been investigated. PTB patients were classified into a frontline NAA group, an add-on NAA group, and a no NAA group. The outcomes of interest were the proportion of PTB case died before anti-TB treatment, the interval between sputum examination and initiation of treatment, and misdiagnosis of PTB. A total of 2192 PTB patients were enrolled, including 282 with frontline NAA, 717 with add-on NAA, and 1193 with no NAA tests. Patients with NAA tests had a lower death rate before treatment initiation compared to those without NAA tests (1.6% vs. 4.4%, p < 0.001) in all cases. Patients with frontline NAA compared to those with add-on NAA and those without NAA, had a shorter interval between sputum examination and treatment initiation in all cases (3 days vs. 6 days (p < 0.001), vs 18 days (p < 0.001)), and less misdiagnosis in smear-positive cases (1.8% vs. 5.6% (p = 0.039), vs 6.5% (p = 0.026)). In conclusion, NAA tests help prevent death before treatment initiation. Frontline NAA tests perform better than add-on NAA and no NAA in avoiding treatment delay in all cases, and misdiagnosis of PTB in smear-positive cases.

Citing Articles

Duplex recombinase aided amplification-lateral flow dipstick assay for rapid distinction of and .

Chen K, Zhang J, Wang S, Yi Z, Fu Y Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024; 14:1454096.

PMID: 39450337 PMC: 11499229. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1454096.


Diagnostic efficacy of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchoscopic lung biopsy for identifying tuberculous nodules.

Zou X, Xu H, Hu Q, Qi Q, Ma X, Cai Q BMC Infect Dis. 2024; 24(1):861.

PMID: 39187759 PMC: 11346205. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-024-09761-8.

References
1.
Boehme C, Nabeta P, Hillemann D, Nicol M, Shenai S, Krapp F . Rapid molecular detection of tuberculosis and rifampin resistance. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(11):1005-15. PMC: 2947799. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907847. View

2.
Uplekar M, Weil D, Lonnroth K, Jaramillo E, Lienhardt C, Dias H . WHO's new end TB strategy. Lancet. 2015; 385(9979):1799-1801. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60570-0. View

3.
Agizew T, Boyd R, Auld A, Payton L, Pals S, Lekone P . Treatment outcomes, diagnostic and therapeutic impact: Xpert vs. smear. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2019; 23(1):82-92. PMC: 6872902. DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.18.0203. View

4.
Naidoo P, Dunbar R, Lombard C, Du Toit E, Caldwell J, Detjen A . Comparing Tuberculosis Diagnostic Yield in Smear/Culture and Xpert® MTB/RIF-Based Algorithms Using a Non-Randomised Stepped-Wedge Design. PLoS One. 2016; 11(3):e0150487. PMC: 4773132. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150487. View

5.
Ardizzoni E, Fajardo E, Saranchuk P, Casenghi M, Page A, Varaine F . Implementing the Xpert® MTB/RIF Diagnostic Test for Tuberculosis and Rifampicin Resistance: Outcomes and Lessons Learned in 18 Countries. PLoS One. 2015; 10(12):e0144656. PMC: 4682866. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144656. View