Spanish Rhythm Association Member´s Perspectives on Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Reuse in Low- and Middle-income Countries

Overview

Journal J Interv Card Electrophysiol

Publisher Springer

Date 2022 Jul 14

PMID 35835889

Authors

Inigo Lorenzo Ruiz

Larraitz Gaztanaga Arantzamendi

Xabier Marichalar Mendia

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Postmortem explanted cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) from developed countries could provide patients unable to afford new devices in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) a treatment they lack. This study describes the preferences of electrophysiologists and device implanting cardiologists from Spain on the management of explanted CIEDs and opinions and concerns regarding reuse in LMIC.

Methods: A nationwide self-administered questionnaire was sent to members of the Spanish Rhythm Association (n = 1110), between December 2020 and January 2021.

Results: Forty-two physician responses were obtained (response rate 5%). There was a strong preference to donate explanted devices for reuse in humans (61.9%) or animals (31%). The vast majority of the participants thought device reutilization was safe, ethical, and a reasonable alternative if a new device is not accessible. Moreover, they indicated they would be comfortable asking patients to consider post-mortem donation, and willing to implant post-mortem explanted and resterilized devices if they were unable to obtain new ones. 57.1% of respondents considered it would be beneficial for patients to have a document so they could reflect their wishes regarding device handling after their death. The most mentioned concerns regarding device reuse were malfunction (57.1%) and infection (54.8%).

Conclusions: The majority of respondents support reusable CIED donation to LMIC. It would be interesting to study the feasibility of a nationwide device reutilization program.

Citing Articles

Design and maintenance of medical oxygen concentrators in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.

Ibrahim N, Wallace J, Piaggio D, Pecchia L BMC Health Serv Res. 2025; 25(1):171.

PMID: 39875982 PMC: 11776221. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-12315-6.

References

Sears S, Todaro J, Urizar G, Lewis T, Sirois B, Wallace R . Assessing the psychosocial impact of the ICD: a national survey of implantable cardioverter defibrillator health care providers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000; 23(6):939-45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb00878.x. View

Mond H, Irwin M, Ector H, Proclemer A . The world survey of cardiac pacing and cardioverter-defibrillators: calendar year 2005 an International Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology Society (ICPES) project. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008; 31(9):1202-12. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01164.x. View

Iyer I, Mackall J . Patient preferences regarding device reuse and potential of devices for reuse - a study in a veteran population. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2013; 13(3):101-8. PMC: 3691387. DOI: 10.1016/s0972-6292(16)30626-x. View

Xu W, Moore H, Karasik P, Franz M, Singh S, Fletcher R . Management strategies when implanted cardioverter defibrillator leads fail: survey findings. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009; 32(9):1130-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02454.x. View

Pombo Jimenez M, Cano Perez O, Fidalgo Andres M, Lorente Carreno D, Coma Samartin R . Spanish Pacemaker Registry. Thirteenth Official Report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiac Pacing (2015). Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2016; 69(12):1190-1203. DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2016.08.017. View

Logani S, Gottlieb M, Verdino R, Baman T, Eagle K, Kirkpatrick J . Recovery of pacemakers and defibrillators for analysis and device advance directives: electrophysiologists' perspectives. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011; 34(6):659-65. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03032.x. View

Glister J, Glister T . Property in recyclable artificial implants. J Law Med. 2014; 21(2):357-63. View

Deering T, Clair W, Delaughter M, Fisher W, Garlitski A, Wilkoff B . A Heart Rhythm Society Electrophysiology Workforce study: current survey analysis of physician workforce trends. Heart Rhythm. 2010; 7(9):1346-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.07.026. View

Wunderly K, Yousef Z, Bonny A, Weatherwax K, Lavan B, Allmendinger C . Using reconditioned pacemakers to treat bradycardia in Africa. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018; 15(12):725-726. DOI: 10.1038/s41569-018-0076-y. View

10.

Baman T, Crawford T, Sovitch P, Meier P, Sovitch N, Gakenheimer L . Feasibility of postmortem device acquisition for potential reuse in underserved nations. Heart Rhythm. 2011; 9(2):211-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.09.067. View

11.

Runge M, Baman T, Davis S, Weatherwax K, Goldman E, Eagle K . Pacemaker recycling: A notion whose time has come. World J Cardiol. 2017; 9(4):296-303. PMC: 5411963. DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i4.296. View

12.

Linde C, Bocray A, Jonsson H, Rosenqvist M, Radegran K, Ryden L . Re-used pacemakers--as safe as new? A retrospective case-control study. Eur Heart J. 1998; 19(1):154-7. DOI: 10.1053/euhj.1997.0728. View

13.

Hughey A, Desai N, Baman T, Gakenheimer L, Hagan L, Kirkpatrick J . Heart Rhythm Society members' views on pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator reuse. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014; 37(8):969-77. DOI: 10.1111/pace.12418. View

14.

Lorenzo Ruiz I . Reuse of cardiac implantable electronic devices in developing countries perspectives: A literature review. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021; 45(2):241-249. DOI: 10.1111/pace.14422. View

15.

Psaltikidis E, Costa E, Uchikawa Graziano K . Reuse of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: systematic review, meta-analysis and quality assessment of the body of evidence. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2021; 18(6):553-567. DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2021.1927706. View

16.

Gaziano T, Bitton A, Anand S, Abrahams-Gessel S, Murphy A . Growing epidemic of coronary heart disease in low- and middle-income countries. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2010; 35(2):72-115. PMC: 2864143. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2009.10.002. View