» Articles » PMID: 35833998

A Neglected Pioneer of Psychology: Otto Selz's Contribution to the Psychology of Thinking and the Dispute with Gestalt Psychologists in Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung

Overview
Journal Psychol Res
Specialty Psychology
Date 2022 Jul 14
PMID 35833998
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the early decades of the twentieth century, Psychologische Forschung was primarily an outlet for researchers from the school of Gestalt psychology. Otto Selz, whose views were closer to those adopted in the cognitive/information-processing revolution in psychology that began in the 1950s, never published in Psychologische Forschung. However, his work was the subject of a negative evaluation in the journal in a book review by Wilhelm Benary, which was followed by critical assessments published elsewhere by Selz and Karl Bühler of a chapter of Kurt Koffka's. A lengthy rebuttal from Koffka then appeared in Psychologische Forschung. In the present paper, we describe Selz's system and Benary's assessment of it. We then explain the relevant aspects of Koffka's book chapter (in: Dessoir M (ed) Die Philosophie in ihren Einzelgebieten. Ullstein, Berlin, 1925) and the strong critiques of it by Bühler and Selz in 1926, followed by details of Koffka's (Psychol Forsch 9:163-183, 1927) response. This part of the history of psychology is of significance to contemporary psychology on several levels. We have embedded this episode against the historical backdrop of Selz's life and tragic end.

References
1.
Eder A, Dignath D . Associations do not energize behavior: on the forgotten legacy of Kurt Lewin. Psychol Res. 2021; 86(8):2341-2351. PMC: 9674759. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-021-01631-1. View

2.
Grafton S, F de C Hamilton A . Evidence for a distributed hierarchy of action representation in the brain. Hum Mov Sci. 2007; 26(4):590-616. PMC: 2042582. DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2007.05.009. View

3.
Horne Z, Muradoglu M, Cimpian A . Explanation as a Cognitive Process. Trends Cogn Sci. 2019; 23(3):187-199. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.12.004. View

4.
Kuusela H, Paul P . A comparison of concurrent and retrospective verbal protocol analysis. Am J Psychol. 2000; 113(3):387-404. View

5.
Posner M . Timing the brain: mental chronometry as a tool in neuroscience. PLoS Biol. 2005; 3(2):e51. PMC: 548951. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030051. View