» Articles » PMID: 35832600

A Clinical Framework for Assessing Cannabis-Related Impairment Risk

Overview
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2022 Jul 14
PMID 35832600
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Clinicians play an important role in promoting safe and responsible medical cannabis use. One essential component to safe use is considering a patient's risk of neurocognitive impairment. However, there remains a lack of practical guidance on how clinicians can evaluate this risk for medical cannabis patients. Here, a practical framework is presented for clinicians to assess and stratify cannabis-associated impairment risk. The proposed framework is intended to practically guide healthcare providers in gaining a more comprehensive review of a patient's impairment-related factors. This framework can be used to assess impairment risk for patients currently using or considering medical cannabis and is recommended for all patients who perform safety-sensitive duties. Healthcare providers (HCP) managing patient's medical cannabis or those conducting assessments to determine risk of impairment for safety-sensitive workplaces can utilize this framework to stratify patients' risk of impairment. Such assessments can inform patient-specific needs for support, education, and guidance, to ensure cannabis is used safely and responsibly.

Citing Articles

Differences in prescribed medicinal cannabis use by cannabinoid product composition: Findings from the cannabis as medicine survey 2020 (CAMS-20) Australia-wide study.

Trevitt B, Bailey S, Mills L, Arkell T, Suraev A, McGregor I PLoS One. 2024; 19(2):e0297092.

PMID: 38354169 PMC: 10866492. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297092.


A semi-naturalistic open-label study examining the effect of prescribed medical cannabis use on simulated driving performance.

Manning B, Arkell T, Hayley A, Downey L J Psychopharmacol. 2024; 38(3):247-257.

PMID: 38332655 PMC: 10944578. DOI: 10.1177/02698811241229524.


Driving-related behaviors, attitudes, and perceptions among Australian medical cannabis users: results from the CAMS 20 survey.

Arkell T, Abelev S, Mills L, Suraev A, Arnold J, Lintzeris N J Cannabis Res. 2023; 5(1):35.

PMID: 37674243 PMC: 10481606. DOI: 10.1186/s42238-023-00202-y.


Workplace and non-workplace cannabis use and the risk of workplace injury: Findings from a longitudinal study of Canadian workers.

Carnide N, Landsman V, Lee H, Frone M, Furlan A, Smith P Can J Public Health. 2023; 114(6):947-955.

PMID: 37523062 PMC: 10661545. DOI: 10.17269/s41997-023-00795-0.


Cannabis use among workers with work-related injuries and illnesses: results from a cross-sectional study of workers' compensation claimants in Ontario, Canada.

Carnide N, Nadalin V, Mustard C, Severin C, Furlan A, Smith P BMJ Open. 2023; 13(7):e072994.

PMID: 37463805 PMC: 10357653. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072994.

References
1.
Curran H, Brignell C, Fletcher S, Middleton P, Henry J . Cognitive and subjective dose-response effects of acute oral Delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in infrequent cannabis users. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2002; 164(1):61-70. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-002-1169-0. View

2.
Ramaekers J, Kauert G, Theunissen E, Toennes S, Moeller M . Neurocognitive performance during acute THC intoxication in heavy and occasional cannabis users. J Psychopharmacol. 2008; 23(3):266-77. DOI: 10.1177/0269881108092393. View

3.
Eadie L, Lo L, Christiansen A, Brubacher J, Barr A, Panenka W . Duration of Neurocognitive Impairment With Medical Cannabis Use: A Scoping Review. Front Psychiatry. 2021; 12:638962. PMC: 8006301. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.638962. View

4.
Bonn-Miller M, Loflin M, Thomas B, Marcu J, Hyke T, Vandrey R . Labeling Accuracy of Cannabidiol Extracts Sold Online. JAMA. 2017; 318(17):1708-1709. PMC: 5818782. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.11909. View

5.
Abrams D, Vizoso H, Shade S, Jay C, Kelly M, Benowitz N . Vaporization as a smokeless cannabis delivery system: a pilot study. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007; 82(5):572-8. DOI: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100200. View