» Articles » PMID: 35830234

Implementation of a Statewide Web-Based Caregiver Resource Information System (CareNav): Mixed Methods Study

Overview
Journal JMIR Form Res
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2022 Jul 13
PMID 35830234
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: With the aging population, family caregivers provide increasingly complex and intense care for older adults and persons with disabilities. There is growing interest in developing community-based services to support family caregivers. Caregiving occurs around the clock, and caregivers face challenges in accessing community-based services at convenient times owing to the demands of care. Web-based resources hold promise for accessible real-time support. CareNav (TM), a caregiver resource information system, is a web-based platform designed to support real-time universal caregiver assessment, a record of client encounters, development of a care plan, tailored information and resource content, access to web-based caregiver resources, the capacity to track service authorization and contracts, and secure communications. The assessment includes needs and health conditions of both the care recipient and caregiver; current resources; and priorities for support, information, and referral. In 2019, the California Department of Health Care Services funded the 11 nonprofit California Caregiver Resource Centers (CRCs) to expand and improve family caregiver services and enhance CRC information technology services. Deployment of a statewide information system offered a unique opportunity to examine structures and processes facilitating implementation, providing feedback to the sites as well as lessons learned for similar projects in the future.

Objective: The aim of this paper was to describe the statewide implementation of the comprehensive CareNav system using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research as an organizing structure for synthesizing the evaluation.

Methods: This mixed methods study used two major approaches to evaluate the implementation process: a survey of all staff who completed training (n=82) and in-depth qualitative interviews with 11 CRC teams and 3 key informants (n=35). We initially analyzed interview transcripts using qualitative descriptive methods and then identified subthemes and relationships among ideas, mapping the findings to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

Results: We present findings on the outer setting, inner setting, characteristics of the intervention, characteristics of the staff, and the implementation process. The critical elements for success were leadership, communication, harmonization of processes across sites, and motivation to serve clients in more accessible and convenient ways.

Conclusions: These findings have implications for technology deployment in diverse community-based agencies that aspire to enhance web-based services.

Citing Articles

The Implementation Outcomes and Population Impact of a Statewide IT Deployment for Family Caregivers: Mixed Methods Study.

Tonkikh O, Young H, Bell J, Famula J, Whitney R, Mongoven J JMIR Aging. 2024; 7:e63355.

PMID: 39657176 PMC: 11669000. DOI: 10.2196/63355.


Habit and Help-Experiences of Technology Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Interview Study Among Older Adults.

Kilaberia T, Hu Y, Bell J JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e58242.

PMID: 39422990 PMC: 11530731. DOI: 10.2196/58242.


Comparing Social Isolation in Older Adults With and Without Physical Health Challenges During COVID-19: Church and Church Friends Matter.

Kilaberia T, Hu Y, Ratner E, Bell J Inquiry. 2024; 61:469580241273277.

PMID: 39396163 PMC: 11483851. DOI: 10.1177/00469580241273277.


Implementation outcomes from a multi-site stepped wedge cluster randomized family caregiver skills training trial.

Van Houtven C, Decosimo K, Drake C, Bruening R, Sperber N, Dadolf J Health Serv Res. 2024; 59(6):e14361.

PMID: 39118405 PMC: 11622292. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.14361.


[Interface Communication and Information Transfer in Medical Care for People with Intellectual Disabilities: Qualitative Expert Interviews].

Mainz A, Meister S, Budroni H, Hasseler M, Schmidt P, Stockmann J Gesundheitswesen. 2023; 86(5):380-388.

PMID: 38134915 PMC: 11077553. DOI: 10.1055/a-2167-2245.


References
1.
Lorca-Cabrera J, Grau C, Marti-Arques R, Raigal-Aran L, Falco-Pegueroles A, Albacar-Rioboo N . Effectiveness of health web-based and mobile app-based interventions designed to improve informal caregiver's well-being and quality of life: A systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2019; 134:104003. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104003. View

2.
Wasilewski M, Stinson J, Cameron J . Web-based health interventions for family caregivers of elderly individuals: A Scoping Review. Int J Med Inform. 2017; 103:109-138. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.04.009. View

3.
Kaltenbaugh D, Klem M, Hu L, Turi E, Haines A, Hagerty Lingler J . Using Web-based interventions to support caregivers of patients with cancer: a systematic review. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2015; 42(2):156-64. DOI: 10.1188/15.ONF.156-164. View

4.
Bradshaw C, Atkinson S, Doody O . Employing a Qualitative Description Approach in Health Care Research. Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2017; 4:2333393617742282. PMC: 5703087. DOI: 10.1177/2333393617742282. View

5.
Male D, Fergus K, Stephen J . Professional Online Support Group Facilitators: Guarantors of Maximal Group Utility. Int J Group Psychother. 2024; 67(3):314-336. DOI: 10.1080/00207284.2016.1240587. View