» Articles » PMID: 35817080

Cross-sectional Analysis of Whole-brain Microstructural Changes in Adult Patients with Bipolar and Unipolar Depression by Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging

Overview
Journal Neuroradiol J
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialties Neurology
Radiology
Date 2022 Jul 11
PMID 35817080
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rationale And Objectives: More than half of the bipolar depression (BD) subjects are misdiagnosed as unipolar depression (UD) due to lack of objective diagnostic criteria. We aimed to identify microstructural neuronal changes differentiating BD from UD groups using diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI). The objective of the study is to identify an objective neuro-imaging marker to differentiate BD from UD.

Materials And Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional study included total of 62 subjects with diagnosis of bipolar depression ( = 21), unipolar depression ( = 21), and healthy controls ( = 20). All subjects underwent diffusion-weighted imaging (b = 0,1000,2000) of the whole brain on 3-Tesla MR scanner. DKI data was analyzed using 189 region whole-brain atlas. Eight diffusion and kurtosis metrics including mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), radial diffusivity (RD), fractional anisotropy (FA), mean kurtosis (MK), axial kurtosis (AK), radial kurtosis (RK), and kurtosis fractional anisotropy (FKA) were measured against these 189 regions. Principle component analysis (PCA) was utilized to identify the most significant regions of the brain. ANOVA with post hoc tests was used for analyzing these regions.

Results: BD group showed increased MD, RD, decreased AK at the left amygdala and decreased MK and RK at the right hemi-cerebellum. UD group showed increased MK and RK at the right external capsule; and increased AK, MK, and RK at the right amygdala.

Conclusion: The right and left amygdala, right external capsule, and right hemi-cerebellum showed microstructural abnormalities capable of differentiating BD and UD groups. Diffusion imaging especially DKI can aid in management of depression patients.

Citing Articles

Robust, fast and accurate mapping of diffusional mean kurtosis.

Farquhar M, Yang Q, Vegh V Elife. 2024; 12.

PMID: 39374133 PMC: 11458175. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.90465.


Principal component analysis as an efficient method for capturing multivariate brain signatures of complex disorders-ENIGMA study in people with bipolar disorders and obesity.

McWhinney S, Hlinka J, Bakstein E, Dietze L, Corkum E, Abe C Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(8):e26682.

PMID: 38825977 PMC: 11144951. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26682.

References
1.
Uchida M, Serra G, Zayas L, Kenworthy T, Faraone S, Biederman J . Can unipolar and bipolar pediatric major depression be differentiated from each other? A systematic review of cross-sectional studies examining differences in unipolar and bipolar depression. J Affect Disord. 2015; 176:1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.01.037. View

2.
Almeida J, Versace A, Hassel S, Kupfer D, Phillips M . Elevated amygdala activity to sad facial expressions: a state marker of bipolar but not unipolar depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2009; 67(5):414-21. PMC: 2854029. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.09.027. View

3.
Grotegerd D, Stuhrmann A, Kugel H, Schmidt S, Redlich R, Zwanzger P . Amygdala excitability to subliminally presented emotional faces distinguishes unipolar and bipolar depression: an fMRI and pattern classification study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2013; 35(7):2995-3007. PMC: 6869222. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22380. View

4.
Jolliffe I, Cadima J . Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2016; 374(2065):20150202. PMC: 4792409. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2015.0202. View

5.
Zhao L, Wang Y, Jia Y, Zhong S, Sun Y, Zhou Z . Cerebellar microstructural abnormalities in bipolar depression and unipolar depression: A diffusion kurtosis and perfusion imaging study. J Affect Disord. 2016; 195:21-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.01.042. View