» Articles » PMID: 35814462

Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Colorectal Cancer Detection: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview
Journal Front Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Jul 11
PMID 35814462
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which uses strong magnetic fields and radio waves (radiofrequency energy) to make images, is one of the best imaging methods for soft tissues and can clearly display unique anatomical structures. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has been developed for identifying various malignant tumors.

Aim: To investigate the diagnostic value of DWI-MRI quantitative analysis in colorectal cancer detection.

Methods: The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were searched from inception to May 29, 2020. Studies published in English that used DWI-MRI for diagnosing colorectal cancer were included. Case reports, letters, reviews, and studies conducted in non-humans or experiments were excluded. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curves were computed for DWI, and the area under the curve (AUC) and associated standard error (SE) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were also used.

Results: In total, 15 studies with 1,655 participants were finally included in this meta-analysis. There were four prospective studies and 11 retrospective studies. Eight studies focused on rectal cancer, six on colorectal cancer, and one on colonic cancer. The performance of DWI-MRI for diagnosing colorectal cancer was accurate, with pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of 0.88 (95% CI = 0.85-0.91), 0.92 (95% CI = 0.91-0.94), 30.36 (95% CI = 11.05-83.43), and 0.44 (95% CI = 0.30-0.64), respectively. The DOR and HSROC curves were 121 (95% CI = 56-261) and 0.92 (: 4.79), respectively.

Conclusion: DWI showed high diagnostic accuracy for colorectal cancer detection. Further studies with large sample sizes and prospective design are needed to confirm these results.

References
1.
Rafaelsen S, Dam C, Vagn-Hansen C, Moller J, Rahr H, Sjostrom M . CT and 3 Tesla MRI in the TN Staging of Colon Cancer: A Prospective, Blind Study. Curr Oncol. 2022; 29(2):1069-1079. PMC: 8870524. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29020091. View

2.
Molinelli V, Angeretti M, Duka E, Tarallo N, Bracchi E, Novario R . Role of MRI and added value of diffusion-weighted and gadolinium-enhanced MRI for the diagnosis of local recurrence from rectal cancer. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018; 43(11):2903-2912. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-018-1518-z. View

3.
Chandramohan A, Siddiqi U, Mittal R, Eapen A, Jesudason M, Ram T . Diffusion weighted imaging improves diagnostic ability of MRI for determining complete response to neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Eur J Radiol Open. 2020; 7:100223. PMC: 7044654. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2020.100223. View

4.
Whiting P, Weswood M, Rutjes A, Reitsma J, Bossuyt P, Kleijnen J . Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006; 6:9. PMC: 1421422. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-9. View

5.
Pech L, Cercueil J, Jooste V, Krause D, Facy O, Bouvier A . Current use of MRI in patients with liver metastatic colorectal cancer: a population-based study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 29(10):1126-1130. DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000933. View