» Articles » PMID: 35814334

Conserved Recombination Patterns Across Coronavirus Subgenera

Abstract

Recombination contributes to the genetic diversity found in coronaviruses and is known to be a prominent mechanism whereby they evolve. It is apparent, both from controlled experiments and in genome sequences sampled from nature, that patterns of recombination in coronaviruses are non-random and that this is likely attributable to a combination of sequence features that favour the occurrence of recombination break points at specific genomic sites, and selection disfavouring the survival of recombinants within which favourable intra-genome interactions have been disrupted. Here we leverage available whole-genome sequence data for six coronavirus subgenera to identify specific patterns of recombination that are conserved between multiple subgenera and then identify the likely factors that underlie these conserved patterns. Specifically, we confirm the non-randomness of recombination break points across all six tested coronavirus subgenera, locate conserved recombination hot- and cold-spots, and determine that the locations of transcriptional regulatory sequences are likely major determinants of conserved recombination break-point hotspot locations. We find that while the locations of recombination break points are not uniformly associated with degrees of nucleotide sequence conservation, they display significant tendencies in multiple coronavirus subgenera to occur in low guanine-cytosine content genome regions, in non-coding regions, at the edges of genes, and at sites within the Spike gene that are predicted to be minimally disruptive of Spike protein folding. While it is apparent that sequence features such as transcriptional regulatory sequences are likely major determinants of where the template-switching events that yield recombination break points most commonly occur, it is evident that selection against misfolded recombinant proteins also strongly impacts observable recombination break-point distributions in coronavirus genomes sampled from nature.

Citing Articles

ACE2 utilization of HKU25 clade MERS-related coronaviruses with broad geographic distribution.

Liu C, Park Y, Ma C, Stuart C, Gen R, Sun Y bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 40027745 PMC: 11870458. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.19.639017.


species are shaped by recombination and can be reliably distinguished in ORF1b genome region.

Aleshina Y, Lukashev A Virus Evol. 2025; 11(1):veaf006.

PMID: 39989717 PMC: 11842974. DOI: 10.1093/ve/veaf006.


Positive selection, genetic recombination, and intra-host evolution in novel equine coronavirus genomes and other members of the subgenus.

Zehr J, Kosakovsky Pond S, Shank S, McQueary H, Grenier J, Whittaker G Microbiol Spectr. 2024; 12(11):e0086724.

PMID: 39373506 PMC: 11542594. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.00867-24.


Cellular dynamics shape recombination frequency in coronaviruses.

Bonavita C, Wells H, Anthony S PLoS Pathog. 2024; 20(9):e1012596.

PMID: 39331680 PMC: 11463787. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1012596.


Comparing the molecular evolution and recombination patterns of predominant PRRSV-2 lineages co-circulating in China.

Zhang R, Li H, Xie H, Hou X, Zhou L, Cao A Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1398470.

PMID: 38737413 PMC: 11088243. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1398470.


References
1.
Manfredonia I, Nithin C, Ponce-Salvatierra A, Ghosh P, Wirecki T, Marinus T . Genome-wide mapping of SARS-CoV-2 RNA structures identifies therapeutically-relevant elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020; 48(22):12436-12452. PMC: 7736786. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1053. View

2.
Zehr J, Kosakovsky Pond S, Martin D, Ceres K, Whittaker G, Millet J . Recent Zoonotic Spillover and Tropism Shift of a Canine Coronavirus Is Associated with Relaxed Selection and Putative Loss of Function in NTD Subdomain of Spike Protein. Viruses. 2022; 14(5). PMC: 9145938. DOI: 10.3390/v14050853. View

3.
Keck J, Matsushima G, Makino S, Fleming J, Vannier D, Stohlman S . In vivo RNA-RNA recombination of coronavirus in mouse brain. J Virol. 1988; 62(5):1810-3. PMC: 253235. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.62.5.1810-1813.1988. View

4.
Sola I, Almazan F, Zuniga S, Enjuanes L . Continuous and Discontinuous RNA Synthesis in Coronaviruses. Annu Rev Virol. 2016; 2(1):265-88. PMC: 6025776. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-virology-100114-055218. View

5.
Wrapp D, Wang N, Corbett K, Goldsmith J, Hsieh C, Abiona O . Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science. 2020; 367(6483):1260-1263. PMC: 7164637. DOI: 10.1126/science.abb2507. View