» Articles » PMID: 35813800

Point-wise Variability of Threshold Sensitivity of 24-2 and 10-2 Visual Fields

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2022 Jul 11
PMID 35813800
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate point-wise variability of threshold sensitivity at different test locations on 24-2 and 10-2 visual field (VF).

Materials And Methods: Electronic medical records of patients seen at a tertiary eye care center were screened to include those with at least 3 reliable VF with glaucomatous defects involving fixation on 24-2 and confirmed on 10-2 test strategy. Ninety eyes of 90 patients were categorized into 3 severity groups based on mean deviation (MD on 24-2) test strategy; MD<-6 dB and >-12 dB, <-12 dB and >-20 dB and <-20 dB and >-30 dB. Variability of threshold sensitivity at all topographical test locations in central (ring 1), mid-peripheral (ring 2), peripheral rings on 24-2 VF test strategy (ring 3), and central (ring 4) and paracentral (ring 5) on 10-2 VF test along with variability of visual field index and central field index were calculated by multilevel mixed effects model.

Results: Central ring1 on 24-2 and ring 4 on 10-2 showed higher variability (>10 dB) than peripheral ring 2, 3, and 5. Seventy-three eyes were adjudged as stable and 17 as progressing in this cohort. The average ring and point-wise variability was higher in stable eyes (2-6 dB) across all glaucoma severities. Across severity, variability was seen to decrease with increasing severity with minimal variability in point-wise threshold sensitivity beyond MD <-20 dB.

Conclusion: Central test points/ring on 24-2 and 10-2 with greater threshold variability suggests that status of the eye, severity and topographical location of test points should be incorporated into conventional progression algorithms to predict true glaucoma progression.

Citing Articles

To identify risk factors for central visual field progression in moderate to advanced glaucoma.

Patil T, Natarajan V, George R Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024; 72(12):1734-1740.

PMID: 39141492 PMC: 11727959. DOI: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2735_23.

References
1.
Park S, Kung Y, Su D, Simonson J, Furlanetto R, Liebmann J . Parafoveal scotoma progression in glaucoma: humphrey 10-2 versus 24-2 visual field analysis. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120(8):1546-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.045. View

2.
Flammer J, Drance S, Zulauf M . Differential light threshold. Short- and long-term fluctuation in patients with glaucoma, normal controls, and patients with suspected glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984; 102(5):704-6. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1984.01040030560017. View

3.
Drance S, Berry V, Hughes A . Studies on the effects of age on the central and peripheral isopters of the visual field in normal subjects. Am J Ophthalmol. 1967; 63(6):1667-72. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9394(67)93644-6. View

4.
Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J . Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987; 105(11):1544-9. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1987.01060110090039. View

5.
Gardiner S, Demirel S, Johnson C . Modeling the sensitivity to variability relationship in perimetry. Vision Res. 2006; 46(11):1732-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.11.019. View