Defining "Normal" Static and Dynamic Spinopelvic Characteristics: A Cross-Sectional Study
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Methods: This was a cross-sectional cohort study of 112 asymptomatic volunteers (age, 47.4 ± 17.7 years; 50.0% female; BMI, 27.3 ± 4.9 kg/m). All participants underwent lateral spinopelvic radiography in the standing and deep-seated positions to determine maximum hip and lumbar flexion. Lumbar flexion (change in lumbar lordosis, ∆LL), hip flexion (change in pelvic-femoral angle, ∆PFA), and pelvic movement (change in pelvic tilt, ΔPT) were determined. The hip user index, which quantifies the relative contribution of the hip to overall sagittal movement, was calculated as (∆PFA/[∆PFA + ∆LL]) × 100%.
Results: There were decreases of 4.5° (9%) per decade of age in lumbar flexion (rho, -0.576; p < 0.001) and 3.6° (4%) per decade in hip flexion (rho, -0.365; p < 0.001). ∆LL could be predicted by younger age, low standing PFA, and high standing LL. Standing spinopelvic characteristics were similar between sexes. There was a trend toward men having less hip flexion (90.3° ± 16.4° versus 96.4° ± 18.1°; p = 0.065) and a lower hip user index (62.9% ± 8.2% versus 66.7% ± 8.3%; p = 0.015). BMI weakly correlated with ∆LL (rho, -0.307; p = 0.011) and ∆PFA (rho, -0.253; p = 0.039).
Conclusions: Spinopelvic characteristics were found to be age, sex, and BMI-dependent. The changes in the lumbar spine during aging (loss of lumbar lordosis and flexion) were greater than the changes in the hip, and as a result, the hip's relative contribution to overall sagittal movement increased. Men had a greater change in posterior pelvic tilt when moving from a standing to a deep-seated position in comparison with women, secondary to less hip flexion. The influence of BMI on spinopelvic parameters was low.
Wagner M, Verhaegen J, Vorimore C, Innmann M, Grammatopoulos G Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025; 145(1):165.
PMID: 39960539 PMC: 11832690. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05739-y.
Spinal alignment and surgical correction in the aging spine and osteoporotic patient.
Metkar U, Lavelle W, Larsen K, Haddas R, Lavelle W N Am Spine Soc J. 2024; 19:100531.
PMID: 39286293 PMC: 11404170. DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100531.
Ryan N, Kowalski E, Antoniades S, Catelli D, Beaule P, Lamontagne M Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024; 482(9):1642-1655.
PMID: 39226524 PMC: 11343557. DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003106.
Vorimore C, Verhaegen J, Innmann M, Monk A, Ling C, Grammatopoulos G Acta Orthop. 2024; 95:425-432.
PMID: 39037005 PMC: 11261814. DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2024.41091.
Verhaegen J, Alves Batista N, Horton I, Rakhra K, Beaule P, Michielsen J JB JS Open Access. 2023; 8(1).
PMID: 37908325 PMC: 10614646. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00095.