» Articles » PMID: 35809741

Female Sex is Associated with More Reinterventions After Endovascular and Open Interventions for Intermittent Claudication

Overview
Journal Ann Vasc Surg
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2022 Jul 9
PMID 35809741
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Intermittent claudication (IC) is a commonly treated vascular condition. Patient sex has been shown to influence outcomes of interventions for other vascular disorders; however, whether outcomes of interventions for IC vary by sex is unclear. We sought to assess the association of patient sex with outcomes after IC interventions.

Methods: The Vascular Quality Initiative was queried from 2010-2020 for all peripheral endovascular interventions (PVI), infra-inguinal bypasses (IIB), and supra-inguinal bypasses (SIB) for any degree IC. Univariable and multivariable analyses compared peri-operative and long-term outcomes by patient sex.

Results: There were 24,701 female and 40,051 male patients undergoing PVI, 2,789 female and 6,525 male patients undergoing IIB, and 1,695 female and 2,370 male patients undergoing SIB for IC. Guideline-recommended pre-operative medical therapy differed with female patients less often prescribed aspirin for PVI (73.4% vs. 77.3%), IIB (71.5% vs. 74.8%), and SIB (70.9% vs. 74.3%) or statins for PVI (71.8% vs. 76.7%) and IIB (73.1% vs. 76.0%) (all P < 0.05). Female compared with male patients had lower 1-year reintervention-free survival after PVI (84.4% ± 0.3% vs. 86.3% ± 0.2%, P < 0.001), IIB (79.0% ± 0.9% vs. 81.2% ± 0.6%, P = 0.04), and SIB (89.4% ± 0.9% vs. 92.6% ± 0.7%, P = 0.005), but similar amputation-free survival and survival across all procedures. Multivariable analysis confirmed that female sex was associated with increased 1-year reintervention for PVI (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.09-1.24, P < 0.001), IIB, (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.03-1.31, P = 0.02), and SIB (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.20-2.13, P = 0.001).

Conclusions: Female patients undergoing interventions for IC were less often pre-operatively medically optimized than male patients, though the difference was small. Furthermore, female sex was associated with more reinterventions after interventions. Interventionists treating female patients should increase their efforts to maximize medical therapy. Future research should clarify reasons for poorer intervention durability in female patients.

References
1.
Wang J, He Y, Shu C, Zhao J, Dubois L . The effect of gender on outcomes after lower extremity revascularization. J Vasc Surg. 2017; 65(3):889-906.e4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.11.030. View

2.
Enriquez J, Pratap P, Zbilut J, Calvin J, Volgman A . Women tolerate drug therapy for coronary artery disease as well as men do, but are treated less frequently with aspirin, beta-blockers, or statins. Gend Med. 2008; 5(1):53-61. DOI: 10.1016/s1550-8579(08)80008-3. View

3.
Siracuse J, Woodson J, Ellis R, Farber A, Roddy S, Kalesan B . Intermittent claudication treatment patterns in the commercially insured non-Medicare population. J Vasc Surg. 2021; 74(2):499-504. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.10.090. View

4.
Wang L, Locham S, Dakour-Aridi H, Lillemoe K, Clary B, Malas M . Sex Disparity in Outcomes of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Driven by In-hospital Treatment Delays. Ann Surg. 2019; 270(4):630-638. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003482. View

5.
Lo R, Bensley R, Dahlberg S, Matyal R, Hamdan A, Wyers M . Presentation, treatment, and outcome differences between men and women undergoing revascularization or amputation for lower extremity peripheral arterial disease. J Vasc Surg. 2013; 59(2):409-418.e3. PMC: 3946884. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.07.114. View