» Articles » PMID: 35809356

Diminishing Basic Science Research Experience Among United States Cardiothoracic Surgery Trainees

Overview
Journal J Surg Res
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2022 Jul 9
PMID 35809356
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: There is growing concern regarding the attrition of surgeon-scientists. To understand the decline of basic science research (BSR), it is essential to examine trends in research conducted by trainees. We hypothesized that, over recent decades, cardiothoracic (CT) surgery trainees have published fewer BSR articles.

Materials And Methods: CT surgeons at United States training institutions in 2020 who completed training in the past three decades, excluding international trainees, were analyzed (1991-2000: n = 148; 2001-2010: n = 228; 2011-2020: n = 247). Publication records were obtained from Scopus. Articles with medical subject heading terms involving molecular/cellular or animal research were classified as BSR using the National Institutes of Health iCite Translation module. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test or the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

Results: While the proportion of surgeons who published a first-author paper during training remained stable over the past two decades (178/228 [78.1%] versus 189/247 [76.5%], P = 0.7427), the proportion who published a first-author BSR paper decreased significantly (135/228 [59.2%] versus 96/247 [38.9%], P < 0.0001). Among surgeons who published a first-author paper in training, the total papers published by each trainee did not change over the past two decades (3.5 versus 3.3 first-author papers per 10 y of training, P = 0.8819). However, the number of BSR papers published during training decreased significantly (1.7 versus 0.8 first-author papers per 10 y of training, P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: CT surgery trainees are publishing fewer BSR papers. Additional efforts are needed to increase exposure of trainees to BSR and reaffirm that BSR is a valuable and worthwhile pursuit for academic surgeons.

Citing Articles

Research productivity among applicants who matched into an integrated thoracic surgery residency program: A bibliographic review.

Samadzadeh Tabrizi N, Shen M, Shapeton A, Doshi I, Liu J, Fabian T JTCVS Open. 2025; 23:369-378.

PMID: 40061556 PMC: 11883760. DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.11.017.


Machine Learning on 50,000 Manuscripts Shows Increased Clinical Research by Academic Cardiac Surgeons.

Chandrabhatla A, Narahari A, Qiu K, Vasiliadis T, Nguyen J, Singh A J Surg Res. 2024; 303:71-80.

PMID: 39298941 PMC: 11602380. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.08.017.


Impact of PhD Degree Versus Non-PhD Research Fellowship on Future Research Productivity Among Academic Cardiothoracic Surgeons.

Bajaj S, Wang H, Williams K, Heiler J, Pickering J, Manjunatha K World J Surg. 2022; 46(10):2526-2535.

PMID: 35871657 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06661-3.

References
1.
Wang H, Bajaj S, Williams K, ODonnell C, Heiler J, Krishnan A . Analyzing the Scholarly Impact of Cardiothoracic Surgery Research Using the Relative Citation Ratio. J Surg Res. 2022; 275:265-272. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.02.007. View

2.
Ratcliffe M, Howard C, Mann M, Del Nido P . National Institutes of Health funding for cardiothoracic surgical research. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008; 136(2):392-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.04.009. View

3.
Bell T, Valsangkar N, Joshi M, Mayo J, Blanton C, Zimmers T . The Role of PhD Faculty in Advancing Research in Departments of Surgery. Ann Surg. 2016; 265(1):111-115. PMC: 5396390. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001657. View

4.
Ikonomidis J, Menasche P, Kreisel D, Sellke F, Woo Y, Colson Y . Attrition of the cardiothoracic surgeon-scientist: Definition of the problem and remedial strategies. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019; 158(2):504-508. PMC: 7358982. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.03.057. View

5.
Patel D, Wang H, Bajaj S, Williams K, Pickering J, Heiler J . The Academic Impact of Advanced Clinical Fellowship Training among General Thoracic Surgeons. J Surg Educ. 2021; 79(2):417-425. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.09.003. View