» Articles » PMID: 35808433

A Hybrid Deep Transfer Learning of CNN-Based LR-PCA for Breast Lesion Diagnosis Via Medical Breast Mammograms

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2022 Jul 9
PMID 35808433
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

One of the most promising research areas in the healthcare industry and the scientific community is focusing on the AI-based applications for real medical challenges such as the building of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems for breast cancer. Transfer learning is one of the recent emerging AI-based techniques that allow rapid learning progress and improve medical imaging diagnosis performance. Although deep learning classification for breast cancer has been widely covered, certain obstacles still remain to investigate the independency among the extracted high-level deep features. This work tackles two challenges that still exist when designing effective CAD systems for breast lesion classification from mammograms. The first challenge is to enrich the input information of the deep learning models by generating pseudo-colored images instead of only using the input original grayscale images. To achieve this goal two different image preprocessing techniques are parallel used: contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE) and Pixel-wise intensity adjustment. The original image is preserved in the first channel, while the other two channels receive the processed images, respectively. The generated three-channel pseudo-colored images are fed directly into the input layer of the backbone CNNs to generate more powerful high-level deep features. The second challenge is to overcome the multicollinearity problem that occurs among the high correlated deep features generated from deep learning models. A new hybrid processing technique based on Logistic Regression (LR) as well as Principal Components Analysis (PCA) is presented and called LR-PCA. Such a process helps to select the significant principal components (PCs) to further use them for the classification purpose. The proposed CAD system has been examined using two different public benchmark datasets which are INbreast and mini-MAIS. The proposed CAD system could achieve the highest performance accuracies of 98.60% and 98.80% using INbreast and mini-MAIS datasets, respectively. Such a CAD system seems to be useful and reliable for breast cancer diagnosis.

Citing Articles

Principal component analysis and fine-tuned vision transformation integrating model explainability for breast cancer prediction.

Luong H, Hong P, Minh D, Quang T, The A, Thai-Nghe N Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art. 2025; 8(1):5.

PMID: 40063312 PMC: 11893953. DOI: 10.1186/s42492-025-00186-x.


CNN-Based Cross-Modality Fusion for Enhanced Breast Cancer Detection Using Mammography and Ultrasound.

Wang Y, Wang C, Liu K, Huang Y, Chen T, Chiu K Tomography. 2024; 10(12):2038-2057.

PMID: 39728907 PMC: 11679931. DOI: 10.3390/tomography10120145.


Utilizing Pseudo Color Image to Improve the Performance of Deep Transfer Learning-Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis Schemes in Breast Mass Classification.

Jones M, Zhang K, Faiz R, Islam W, Jo J, Zheng B J Imaging Inform Med. 2024; .

PMID: 39455542 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-024-01237-0.


Machine learning and new insights for breast cancer diagnosis.

Guo Y, Zhang H, Yuan L, Chen W, Zhao H, Yu Q J Int Med Res. 2024; 52(4):3000605241237867.

PMID: 38663911 PMC: 11047257. DOI: 10.1177/03000605241237867.


Maize seeds forecasting with hybrid directional and bi-directional long short-term memory models.

Isik H, Tasdemir S, Taspinar Y, Kursun R, Cinar I, Yasar A Food Sci Nutr. 2024; 12(2):786-803.

PMID: 38370035 PMC: 10867492. DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.3783.


References
1.
Kadah Y, Farag A, Zurada J, Badawi A, Youssef A . Classification algorithms for quantitative tissue characterization of diffuse liver disease from ultrasound images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1996; 15(4):466-78. DOI: 10.1109/42.511750. View

2.
Saadatmand S, Bretveld R, Siesling S, Tilanus-Linthorst M . Influence of tumour stage at breast cancer detection on survival in modern times: population based study in 173,797 patients. BMJ. 2015; 351:h4901. PMC: 4595560. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h4901. View

3.
Ragab D, Sharkas M, Attallah O . Breast Cancer Diagnosis Using an Efficient CAD System Based on Multiple Classifiers. Diagnostics (Basel). 2019; 9(4). PMC: 6963468. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics9040165. View

4.
Samala R, Chan H, Hadjiiski L, Helvie M, Cha K, Richter C . Multi-task transfer learning deep convolutional neural network: application to computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer on mammograms. Phys Med Biol. 2017; 62(23):8894-8908. PMC: 5859950. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa93d4. View

5.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel R, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A . Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71(3):209-249. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660. View