» Articles » PMID: 35805682

Supportive, Delegated, and Common Dyadic Coping Mediates the Association Between Adult Attachment Representation and Relationship Satisfaction: A Dyadic Approach

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Jul 9
PMID 35805682
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine intrapersonal (actor) and interpersonal (partner) associations between attachment, assessed by the Adult Attachment Interview, and satisfaction with the relationship, as well as to establish the possibility of the mediatory effect of supportive, delegated, and common dyadic coping on the aforementioned associations. A dyadic approach has been introduced, using the actor-partner interdependence mediation model and data from 114 heterosexual couples, aged 26 to 60. It has been shown that one's own secure attachment can be perceived as the predictor of one's own relationship satisfaction in women and men and the predictor of a partner's relationship satisfaction in men. The findings support the partially mediating role of dyadic coping in the association between attachment and relationship satisfaction and are a significant contribution to the issue of dyadic coping in general. Adults' secure representations of their childhood experiences may be effective in using their partners as a secure base and also in serving as a secure base themselves, but it is not the sole influence on the quality of the couple's experience together. The we-ness phenomenon and resulting clinical implications were discussed.

Citing Articles

Interrelation between dyadic coping and psychological resilience among cervical cancer couples in Northwest China: An Actor-Partner interdependence model.

Zhang T, Yan P, Huang Z, Liu L, Zhou Y, Xiao Y Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2024; 11(12):100615.

PMID: 39717232 PMC: 11665680. DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100615.


Relationship Between Dyadic Coping with Anxiety and Depression in Infertile Couples: Gender Differences and Dyadic Interaction.

Tang N, Pei M, Xie L, Liang X, Hu J, Gao Y Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023; 16:4909-4919.

PMID: 38089528 PMC: 10710950. DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S437808.

References
1.
Falconier M, Kuhn R . Dyadic Coping in Couples: A Conceptual Integration and a Review of the Empirical Literature. Front Psychol. 2019; 10:571. PMC: 6443825. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00571. View

2.
Ainsworth M . Attachments beyond infancy. Am Psychol. 1989; 44(4):709-16. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.44.4.709. View

3.
Mohammadi K, Samavi A, Ghazavi Z . The Relationship Between Attachment Styles and Lifestyle With Marital Satisfaction. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2016; 18(4):e23839. PMC: 4939067. DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.23839. View

4.
Nissen K . Correlates of self-rated attachment in patients with cancer and their caregivers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychooncology. 2016; 25(9):1017-27. DOI: 10.1002/pon.4057. View

5.
Cohen S, Schulz M, Weiss E, Waldinger R . Eye of the beholder: the individual and dyadic contributions of empathic accuracy and perceived empathic effort to relationship satisfaction. J Fam Psychol. 2012; 26(2):236-45. DOI: 10.1037/a0027488. View