» Articles » PMID: 35805213

Ageism, Job Engagement, Negative Stereotypes, Intergenerational Climate, and Life Satisfaction Among Middle-Aged and Older Employees in a University Setting

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Jul 9
PMID 35805213
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study examined whether age-related discrimination, negative age-related stereotypes about declining abilities due to age, job engagement (cognitive, physical, and emotional), and workplace intergenerational climate in terms of positive intergenerational affect (PIA) and workplace intergenerational inclusiveness (WIG) correlated with life satisfaction in a university setting. The analysis was based on 115-117 faculty and staff, 50 years or older. A Principal Axis factor analysis with Promax rotation on the job-related variable revealed three factors: Experiencing Ageism (discrimination and negative stereotypes), Work Climate (PIA and WIG), and Job Engagement (physical, emotional, and cognitive). The factor-based regression scores on the three-factor-based scores were correlated with life satisfaction and also subjected to hierarchical regression analyses with age, sex, and education entered on the first step and the three factors on the second step. The results of both the correlational and hierarchical regression analysis indicated that experiencing ageism was significantly predictive of life satisfaction, and that ageism may play a more primary role than job engagement and work climate-related variables in accounting for life satisfaction.

Citing Articles

Assessing age discrimination in workplaces: psychometric exploration of the Workplace Age Discrimination Scale (WADS-G).

Funk M, Lorenz T Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1345923.

PMID: 38689726 PMC: 11059957. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1345923.


Intertwined -isms: an exploration of relationships between ageism and sexism in workplace and non-work contexts.

Bae S, Choi M Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1138812.

PMID: 37529305 PMC: 10389284. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1138812.


Differences and Disparities in Ageism Affecting Older US Adults: A Review.

Allen J, Elias L, Greenwood J Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2023; 10(1):17-32.

PMID: 37483335 PMC: 10358738. DOI: 10.1007/s40471-022-00316-6.

References
1.
Levy B . Stereotype Embodiment: A Psychosocial Approach to Aging. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2010; 18(6):332-336. PMC: 2927354. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01662.x. View

2.
Firzly N, Van De Beeck L, Lagace M . Let's Work Together: Assessing the Impact of Intergenerational Dynamics on Young Workers' Ageism Awareness and Job Satisfaction. Can J Aging. 2020; 40(3):489-499. DOI: 10.1017/S0714980820000173. View

3.
Lamont R, Swift H, Abrams D . A review and meta-analysis of age-based stereotype threat: negative stereotypes, not facts, do the damage. Psychol Aging. 2015; 30(1):180-193. PMC: 4360754. DOI: 10.1037/a0038586. View

4.
Yao J, Yang L, Han X, Li Y . Perceived Discrimination and Life Satisfaction of Elderly Chinese People: The Chain Mediating Effects of National Identity and Sense of Community. Front Psychol. 2019; 9:2572. PMC: 6309618. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02572. View

5.
Diener E, Emmons R, Larsen R, Griffin S . The Satisfaction With Life Scale. J Pers Assess. 1985; 49(1):71-5. DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13. View