» Articles » PMID: 35801487

Vestibular Extremely Low-Frequency Magnetic and Electric Stimulation Effects on Human Subjective Visual Vertical Perception

Overview
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2022 Jul 8
PMID 35801487
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Electric fields from both extremely low-frequency magnetic fields (ELF-MF) and alternating current (AC) stimulations impact human neurophysiology. As the retinal photoreceptors, vestibular hair cells are graded potential cells and are sensitive to electric fields. Electrophosphene and magnetophosphene literature suggests different impacts of AC and ELF-MF on the vestibular hair cells. Furthermore, while AC modulates the vestibular system more globally, lateral ELF-MF stimulations could be more utricular specific. Therefore, to further address the impact of ELF-MF-induced electric fields on the human vestibular system and the potential differences with AC stimulations, we investigated the effects of both stimulation modalities on the perception of verticality using a subjective visual vertical (SVV) paradigm. For similar levels of SVV precision, the ELF-MF condition required more time to adjust SVV, and SVV variability was higher with ELF-MF than with AC vestibular-specific stimulations. Yet, the differences between AC and ELF-MF stimulations were small. Overall, this study highlights small differences between AC and ELF-MF vestibular stimulations, underlines a potential utricular contribution, and has implications for international exposure guidelines and standards. © 2022 Bioelectromagnetics Society.

Citing Articles

Unpacking Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation using simulations and relating current flow to reported motions: Comparison across common and specialized electrode placements.

Truong D, Thomas C, Ira S, Valter Y, Clark T, Datta A PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0309007.

PMID: 39186497 PMC: 11346646. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309007.


Stimulus effects of extremely low-frequency electric field exposure on calcium oscillations in a human cortical spheroid.

Saito A, Shiina T, Sekiba Y Bioelectromagnetics. 2024; 46(1):e22521.

PMID: 39183508 PMC: 11650428. DOI: 10.1002/bem.22521.


Biological Effects of Magnetic Storms and ELF Magnetic Fields.

Sarimov R, Serov D, Gudkov S Biology (Basel). 2023; 12(12).

PMID: 38132332 PMC: 10740910. DOI: 10.3390/biology12121506.

References
1.
Laakso I, Hirata A . Computational analysis shows why transcranial alternating current stimulation induces retinal phosphenes. J Neural Eng. 2013; 10(4):046009. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/10/4/046009. View

2.
Carriot J, Jamali M, Chacron M, Cullen K . Statistics of the vestibular input experienced during natural self-motion: implications for neural processing. J Neurosci. 2014; 34(24):8347-57. PMC: 4051983. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0692-14.2014. View

3.
Dieterich M, Brandt T . Ocular torsion and tilt of subjective visual vertical are sensitive brainstem signs. Ann Neurol. 1993; 33(3):292-9. DOI: 10.1002/ana.410330311. View

4.
Antal A, Alekseichuk I, Bikson M, Brockmoller J, Brunoni A, Chen R . Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017; 128(9):1774-1809. PMC: 5985830. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.001. View

5.
Zink R, Bucher S, Weiss A, Brandt T, Dieterich M . Effects of galvanic vestibular stimulation on otolithic and semicircular canal eye movements and perceived vertical. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998; 107(3):200-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0013-4694(98)00056-x. View