» Articles » PMID: 35798623

Three-dimensional Cone-beam Computed Technology Evaluation of Skeletal and Dental Changes in Growing Patients with Class II Malocclusion Treated with the Cervical Pull Face-bow Headgear Appliance

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2022 Jul 7
PMID 35798623
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to 3-dimensionally quantify and compare the outcomes of growing patients with Class II malocclusion treated with the cervical pull face-bow headgear appliance in combination with full fixed orthodontic appliances.

Methods: The study sample consisted of 22 patients with Class II malocclusion with the following inclusion criteria: ANB >4.75°, Class II molar relationship, and SN-GoGn <37°. The mean age of patients was 12.5 ± 1.1 years at baseline. The average treatment time was 27.7 ± 7.3 months. Cone-beam computed tomography scans were superimposed in the cranial base, maxillary regional, and mandibular regional to evaluate growth, treatment displacements, and bone remodeling.

Results: Relevant statistically and clinically significant skeletal changes included average decreases in ANB (2.1 ± 1.1°) and SNA (1.8 ± 1.1°); posterior (1.3 ± 1.4 mm) and inferior (4.6 ± 2.2 mm) displacement of A-point; inferior displacements of B-point (5.4 ± 2.8 mm) and Pogonion (5.8 ± 2.6 mm); superior displacement of Condylion (6.9 ± 2.4 mm); increase in mandibular length (5.4 ± 2.0 mm); and clockwise rotation of palatal plane (1.9 ± 1.9°). Significant proclination of the maxillary incisors (9.8 ± 11.1°) and nonsignificant proclination of the mandibular incisors (4.7 ± 9.6°) were also noted.

Conclusions: Class II skeletal correction was primarily achieved by posterior, inferior displacement of the sagittal position of the maxilla. Change in the sagittal position of the mandible/chin (B-point, Pogonion) was not significant; rather, mandibular displacement was significant in an inferior vertical direction without backward rotation, as seen from marked condylar and ramus growth.

Citing Articles

Automated Orientation and Registration of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans.

Anchling L, Hutin N, Huang Y, Barone S, Roberts S, Miranda F Clin Image Based Proced Fairness AI Med Imaging Ethical Philos Issues Med Imaging (2023). 2024; 14242:43-58.

PMID: 38770027 PMC: 11104011. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-45249-9_5.


Impact of different cephalometric skeletal configurations on anatomic midface parameters in adults.

Willershausen I, Ehrenfried A, Krautkremer F, Strobel A, Seidel C, Paulsen F Clin Oral Investig. 2023; 28(1):55.

PMID: 38157063 PMC: 10756868. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05472-7.


Craniofacial and upper airway morphological characteristics associated with the presence and severity of obstructive sleep apnea in Chinese children.

Xu Q, Wang X, Li N, Wang Y, Xu X, Guo J Front Pediatr. 2023; 11:1124610.

PMID: 37063671 PMC: 10102523. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1124610.

References
1.
. The use of cone-beam computed tomography in dentistry: an advisory statement from the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc. 2012; 143(8):899-902. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0295. View

2.
Taylor K, Evangelista K, Muniz L, Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas A, Valladares-Neto J, McNamara Jr J . Three-dimensional comparison of the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of the Herbst and Pendulum appliances followed by fixed appliances: A CBCT study. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2019; 23(1):72-81. PMC: 7310571. DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12345. View

3.
Tufekci E, Allen S, Best A, Lindauer S . Current trends in headgear use for the treatment of Class II malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 2015; 86(4):584-9. PMC: 8601498. DOI: 10.2319/041315-242.1. View

4.
Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas A, Yatabe M, Souki B, Benavides E, Nguyen T, Luiz R . 3D Mandibular Superimposition: Comparison of Regions of Reference for Voxel-Based Registration. PLoS One. 2016; 11(6):e0157625. PMC: 4919005. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157625. View

5.
Howerton Jr W, Mora M . Advancements in digital imaging: what is new and on the horizon?. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008; 139 Suppl:20S-24S. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0354. View