» Articles » PMID: 35794789

Progress of Periosteal Osteogenesis: The Prospect of In Vivo Bioreactor

Overview
Journal Orthop Surg
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2022 Jul 7
PMID 35794789
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Repairing large segment bone defects is still a clinical challenge. Bone tissue prefabrication shows great translational potentials and has been gradually accepted clinically. Existing bone reconstruction strategies, including autologous periosteal graft, allogeneic periosteal transplantation, xenogeneic periosteal transplantation, and periosteal cell tissue engineering, are all clinically valuable treatments and have made significant progress in research. Herein, we reviewed the research progress of these techniques and briefly explained the relationship among in vivo microenvironment, mechanical force, and periosteum osteogenesis. Moreover, we also highlighted the importance of the critical role of periosteum in osteogenesis and explained current challenges and future perspective.

Citing Articles

Tibial periosteum flap combined with autologous bone grafting in the treatment of Gustilo-IIIB/IIIC open tibial fractures.

Gao Y, Liu Y, Hu H, Gao S, Zhou J Open Med (Wars). 2024; 19(1):20241038.

PMID: 39308921 PMC: 11416071. DOI: 10.1515/med-2024-1038.


Advances in In Vitro and In Vivo Bioreactor-Based Bone Generation for Craniofacial Tissue Engineering.

Watson E, Mikos A BME Front. 2023; 4:0004.

PMID: 37849672 PMC: 10521661. DOI: 10.34133/bmef.0004.


Improving osteoinduction and osteogenesis of Ti6Al4V alloy porous scaffold by regulating the pore structure.

Wang C, Wu J, Liu L, Xu D, Liu Y, Li S Front Chem. 2023; 11:1190630.

PMID: 37265590 PMC: 10229796. DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2023.1190630.


A New Osteogenic Membrane to Enhance Bone Healing: At the Crossroads between the Periosteum, the Induced Membrane, and the Diamond Concept.

Manon J, Evrard R, Fieve L, Bouzin C, Magnin D, Xhema D Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(2).

PMID: 36829637 PMC: 9952848. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10020143.


Periosteum and fascia lata: Are they so different?.

Manon J, Evrard R, Maistriaux L, Fieve L, Heller U, Magnin D Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022; 10:944828.

PMID: 36338112 PMC: 9627508. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.944828.

References
1.
Bolander J, Ji W, Leijten J, Moreira Teixeira L, Bloemen V, Lambrechts D . Healing of a Large Long-Bone Defect through Serum-Free In Vitro Priming of Human Periosteum-Derived Cells. Stem Cell Reports. 2017; 8(3):758-772. PMC: 5355567. DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.01.005. View

2.
Nakahara K, Haga-Tsujimura M, Sawada K, Mottini M, Schaller B, Saulacic N . Periosteal distraction osteogenesis versus immediate periosteal elevation in a rat model: Histological and micro-CT analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017; 45(5):620-627. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.01.030. View

3.
Ueno T, Honda K, Hirata A, Kagawa T, Kanou M, Shirasu N . Histological comparison of bone induced from autogenously grafted periosteum with bone induced from autogenously grafted bone marrow in the rat calvarial defect model. Acta Histochem. 2007; 110(3):217-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.acthis.2007.10.008. View

4.
Bravo D, Josephson A, Bradaschia-Correa V, Wong M, Yim N, Neibart S . Temporary inhibition of the plasminogen activator inhibits periosteal chondrogenesis and promotes periosteal osteogenesis during appendicular bone fracture healing. Bone. 2018; 112:97-106. PMC: 5970081. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2018.04.016. View

5.
Vegas M, Delgado P, Roger I, Carosini R . Vascularized periosteal transfer from the medial femoral condyle: is it compulsory to include the cortical bone?. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012; 72(4):1040-5. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31823dc230. View