» Articles » PMID: 35793958

Frequency of Difficult Patient Encounters in a Japanese University Hospital and Community Hospitals: A Cross-sectional Study

Abstract

Objective Difficult patient encounters (DPEs) are defined as encounters with patients causing strong negative feelings in physicians. In primary care settings, DPEs account for approximately 15% of visits among outpatients. To our knowledge, this is the first epidemiological study of DPEs in Japan. Methods We conducted a survey of 8 physicians (5.0±2 years of clinical experience) who examined first-visit patients ≥15 years old with clinical symptoms at the Department of General Medicine in Chiba University Hospital and 4 community hospitals over a 2-month period since December 2015. Materials We evaluated 10-Item Difficult Doctor-Patient Relationship Questionnaire (DDPRQ-10) scores (DPE ≥31 points; non-DPE ≤30 points) and patient age, sex, and presence of psychological or social problems. Results The valid response rate was 98.9% (94/95) and 98.4% (189/192) in the university and community hospitals, respectively. The percentage of DPEs was 39.8% (37/93) and 15.0% (26/173) in the university and community hospitals, respectively; the percentage of DPEs was significantly higher at the university hospital than at the community hospitals (p<0.001). The proportion of patients with psychosocial problems was significantly higher in the DPE group than in the non-DPE group (93.7% vs. 40.4%, p<0.001). Conclusion Our findings were similar to those reported in primary care settings in other countries in community hospital outpatient and general internal medicine departments, where patients are mostly non-referrals, although the values were higher in university hospital general medicine departments, where patients were mostly referrals. Patients involved in DPEs have a high rate of psychological and social problems.

Citing Articles

Investigating Patient Satisfaction Through Web-Based Reviews of Norwegian Dentists: Quantitative Study Using the Meaning Extraction Method.

Larsen M, Holde G, Johnsen J J Particip Med. 2024; 16:e49262.

PMID: 38700933 PMC: 11102035. DOI: 10.2196/49262.


The validity and IRT psychometric analysis of Chinese version of Difficult Doctor-Patient Relationship Questionnaire (DDPRQ-10).

Du J, Wang Y, Wu A, Jiang Y, Duan Y, Geng W BMC Psychiatry. 2023; 23(1):900.

PMID: 38041038 PMC: 10693043. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-05385-5.

References
1.
Adams J, Murray 3rd R . The general approach to the difficult patient. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1999; 16(4):689-700, v. DOI: 10.1016/s0733-8627(05)70028-6. View

2.
Loeb D, Binswanger I, Candrian C, Bayliss E . Primary care physician insights into a typology of the complex patient in primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2015; 13(5):451-5. PMC: 4569453. DOI: 10.1370/afm.1840. View

3.
Lindquist L, Go L, Fleisher J, Jain N, Friesema E, Baker D . Relationship of health literacy to intentional and unintentional non-adherence of hospital discharge medications. J Gen Intern Med. 2011; 27(2):173-8. PMC: 3270238. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-011-1886-3. View

4.
Marken P, Zimmerman C, Kennedy C, Schremmer R, Smith K . Human simulators and standardized patients to teach difficult conversations to interprofessional health care teams. Am J Pharm Educ. 2010; 74(7):120. PMC: 2972514. DOI: 10.5688/aj7407120. View

5.
Huyse F, Lyons J, Stiefel F, Slaets J, de Jonge P, Fink P . "INTERMED": a method to assess health service needs. I. Development and reliability. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1999; 21(1):39-48. DOI: 10.1016/s0163-8343(98)00057-7. View