» Articles » PMID: 35789335

Item-level Psychometrics of the Ascertain Dementia Eight-Item Informant Questionnaire

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2022 Jul 5
PMID 35789335
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the item-level psychometrics of the Ascertain Dementia Eight-Item Informant Questionnaire (AD-8) by examining its dimensionality, rating scale integrity, item fit statistics, item difficulty hierarchy, item-person match, and precision. We used confirmatory factor analysis and the Rasch rating scale model for analyzing the data extracted from the proxy versions of the 2019 and 2020 National Health and Aging Trends Study, USA. A total of 403 participants were included in the analysis. The confirmatory factor analysis with a 1-factor model using the robust weighted least squares (WLSMV) estimator indicated a unidimensional measurement structure (χ2 = 41.015, df = 20, p = 0.004; root mean square error of approximation = 0.051; comparative fit index = 0.995; Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.993;). The findings indicated that the AD-8 has no misfitting items and no differential item functioning across sex and gender. The items were evenly distributed in the item difficulty rating (range: -2.30 to 0.98 logits). While there were floor effects, the AD-8 revealed good reliability (Rasch person reliability = 0.67, Cronbach's alpha = 0.89). The Rasch analysis reveals that the AD-8 has excellent psychometric properties that can be used as a screening assessment tool in clinical settings allowing clinicians to measure dementia both quickly and efficiently. To summarize, the AD-8 could be a useful primary screening tool to be used with additional diagnostic testing, if the patient is accompanied by a reliable informant.

Citing Articles

Depressive symptom mediates the association between the number of chronic diseases and cognitive impairment: a multi-center cross-sectional study based on community older adults.

Lai L, Huang D, Peng J, Cao X, Feng X, Tao P Front Psychiatry. 2024; 15:1404229.

PMID: 39086730 PMC: 11288913. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1404229.

References
1.
Thacker E, McKnight B, Psaty B, Longstreth Jr W, Sitlani C, Dublin S . Atrial fibrillation and cognitive decline: a longitudinal cohort study. Neurology. 2013; 81(2):119-25. PMC: 3770176. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31829a33d1. View

2.
Galvin J, Roe C, Morris J . Evaluation of cognitive impairment in older adults: combining brief informant and performance measures. Arch Neurol. 2007; 64(5):718-24. DOI: 10.1001/archneur.64.5.718. View

3.
Rand S, Caiels J, Collins G, Forder J . Developing a proxy version of the Adult social care outcome toolkit (ASCOT). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017; 15(1):108. PMC: 5438504. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-017-0682-0. View

4.
Ling L, Tsuji T, Nagamine Y, Miyaguni Y, Kondo K . [Types and number of hobbies and incidence of dementia among older adults: A six-year longitudinal study from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study (JAGES)]. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2020; 67(11):800-810. DOI: 10.11236/jph.67.11_800. View

5.
Hobart J, Cano S, Zajicek J, Thompson A . Rating scales as outcome measures for clinical trials in neurology: problems, solutions, and recommendations. Lancet Neurol. 2007; 6(12):1094-105. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70290-9. View