» Articles » PMID: 35788424

Drilling the Cement Mantle in Well-fixed Periprosthetic Femur Fractures is Not Associated with Arthroplasty-related Complications

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2022 Jul 5
PMID 35788424
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To determine if screw fixation across a cement mantle is safe and effective during plate fixation of well-fixed periprosthetic femur fractures.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Academic Level I Trauma Center.

Patients: Twenty-eight patients with AO/OTA 32A[B1] or 32A[C] periprosthetic femur fractures treated with open reduction and internal plate and screw fixation after cemented or uncemented hip arthroplasty.

Intervention: Screw placement into the cement mantle during internal fixation.

Outcome Measurements: Primary outcome was revision arthroplasty for aseptic loosening. Secondary outcomes included radiographic evidence of aseptic loosening, infection, nonunion, implant failure, and overall reoperation rate.

Results: There were 28 patients who met inclusion criteria. A total of 9 patients had screws placed in the cement mantle while the remaining 19 patients had screws placed around an uncemented stem. At a mean of 3.7-year follow-up, there were no cases of revision arthroplasty or aseptic loosening in either group. There were no significant differences in rates of infection, nonunion, implant failure, or reoperation rate between patients who had screw placement into a cement mantle vs around an uncemented stem.

Conclusion: Drilling into the cement mantle during fixation of a periprosthetic femur fracture around a well-fixed cemented hip stem appears safe and effective. When possible, surgeons can consider bicortical screws around a cemented stem, given the biomechanical advantages over unicortical screw or cerclage fixation. Larger prospective trials confirming the safety of this technique are warranted prior to routine implementation.

Level Of Evidence: III.

Citing Articles

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Vancouver B1 and B2 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: A Proportional Meta-Analysis.

Yoon B, Park S, Roh Y Hip Pelvis. 2023; 35(4):217-227.

PMID: 38125267 PMC: 10728046. DOI: 10.5371/hp.2023.35.4.217.

References
1.
Duncan C, Masri B . Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect. 1995; 44:293-304. View

2.
Fulkerson E, Koval K, Preston C, Iesaka K, Kummer F, Egol K . Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures associated with cemented femoral stems: a biomechanical comparison of locked plating and conventional cable plates. J Orthop Trauma. 2006; 20(2):89-93. DOI: 10.1097/01.bot.0000199119.38359.96. View

3.
Kampshoff J, Stoffel K, Yates P, Erhardt J, Kuster M . The treatment of periprosthetic fractures with locking plates: effect of drill and screw type on cement mantles: a biomechanical analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009; 130(5):627-32. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-009-0952-3. View

4.
Meinberg E, Agel J, Roberts C, Karam M, Kellam J . Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium-2018. J Orthop Trauma. 2017; 32 Suppl 1:S1-S170. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001063. View

5.
Cooke P, Newman J . Fractures of the femur in relation to cemented hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988; 70(3):386-9. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.70B3.3372557. View