» Articles » PMID: 35784895

Cepstral Analysis for Scoring the Quality of Electrocardiograms for Heart Rate Variability

Overview
Journal Front Physiol
Date 2022 Jul 5
PMID 35784895
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mobile-health solutions based on heart rate variability often require electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings by inexperienced operators or real-time automatic analyses of long-term recordings by wearable devices in free-moving individuals. In this context, it is useful to associate a quality index with the ECG, scoring the adequacy of the recording for heart rate variability to identify noise or arrhythmias. Therefore, this work aims to propose and validate a computational method for assessing the adequacy of single-lead ECGs for heart rate variability analysis that may run in real time on wearable systems with low computational power. The method quantifies the ECG pseudo-periodic structure employing cepstral analysis. The cepstrum (spectrum of log-spectrum) is estimated on a running ECG window of 10 s before and after "liftering" (filtering in the cepstral domain) to remove slower noise components. The ECG periodicity generates a dominant peak in the liftered cepstrum at the "quefrency" of the mean cardiac interval. The Cepstral Quality Index (CQI) is the ratio between the cepstral-peak power and the total power of the unliftered cepstrum. Noises and arrhythmias reduce the relative power of the cepstral peak decreasing CQI. We analyzed a public dataset of 6072 single-lead ECGs manually classified in normal rhythm or inadequate for heart rate variability analysis because of noise or atrial fibrillation, and the CQI = 47% cut-off identified the inadequate recordings with 79% sensitivity and 85% specificity. We showed that the performance is independent of the lead considering a public dataset of 1,000 12-lead recordings with quality classified as "acceptable" or "unacceptable" by visual inspection. Thus, the cepstrum describes the ECG periodic structure effectively and concisely and CQI appears to be a robust score of the adequacy of ECG recording for heart rate variability analysis, evaluable in real-time on wearable devices.

References
1.
Goldberger A, Amaral L, Glass L, Hausdorff J, Ivanov P, Mark R . PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals. Circulation. 2000; 101(23):E215-20. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.101.23.e215. View

2.
Lombardi C, Meriggi P, Agostoni P, Faini A, Bilo G, Revera M . High-altitude hypoxia and periodic breathing during sleep: gender-related differences. J Sleep Res. 2013; 22(3):322-30. DOI: 10.1111/jsr.12012. View

3.
Di Rienzo M, Meriggi P, Rizzo F, Castiglioni P, Lombardi C, Ferratini M . Textile technology for the vital signs monitoring in telemedicine and extreme environments. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2010; 14(3):711-7. DOI: 10.1109/TITB.2010.2048921. View

4.
Rahman S, Karmakar C, Natgunanathan I, Yearwood J, Palaniswami M . Robustness of electrocardiogram signal quality indices. J R Soc Interface. 2022; 19(189):20220012. PMC: 9006023. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2022.0012. View

5.
Caravita S, Faini A, Lombardi C, Valentini M, Gregorini F, Rossi J . Sex and acetazolamide effects on chemoreflex and periodic breathing during sleep at altitude. Chest. 2014; 147(1):120-131. DOI: 10.1378/chest.14-0317. View