» Articles » PMID: 35784804

Physiological and Perceptual Responses to Single-player Vs. Multiplayer Exergaming

Overview
Date 2022 Jul 5
PMID 35784804
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rationale: Since many modern exergames include a multiplayer component, this study aimed to compare the physiological and perceptual responses between playing a cycling exergame alone or with others.

Methods: In this randomized crossover study, 15 healthy individuals aged between 10 and 30 years completed a single-player and a multiplayer exergaming session. The main outcomes were exercise intensity, measured as oxygen uptake (V°O) and heart rate (HR), and perceived enjoyment, pleasure, and exertion.

Results: Peak HR was significantly higher during multiplayer (172 ± 23 beats per minute [bpm]) vs. single-player exergaming (159 ± 27 bpm) with a mean difference of 13 bpm (95% CI: 2 to 24, = 0.02). Peak V°O was 33.6 ± 9.5 mL·kg·min and 30.4 ± 9.1 mL·kg·min during multiplayer and single-player exergaming, respectively with no statistically significant difference between conditions (3.2, 95% CI: -0.2-6.6 mL·kg·min, = 0.06). Average HR, average V°O and perceptual responses did not differ between single- and multiplayer exergaming.

Conclusion: Other than inducing a higher HR, multiplayer exergaming showed no significant benefits on exercise intensity or perceptual responses over single-player exergaming. However, the higher peak HR and a tendency of higher peak V°O intensity during multiplayer exergaming imply that multiplayer exergaming may offer some advantages over single-player exergaming that could impact the potential health benefits of exergaming.

Citing Articles

Sensing In Exergames for Efficacy and Motion Quality: Scoping Review of Recent Publications.

Dill S, Muller P, Caserman P, Gobel S, Hoog Antink C, Tregel T JMIR Serious Games. 2024; 12:e52153.

PMID: 39499916 PMC: 11576609. DOI: 10.2196/52153.


Exergaming (physically active video gaming) for mental health service users in a community mental health care setting: an ethnographic observational feasibility study.

Roberts S, Bailey J BMC Psychiatry. 2023; 23(1):752.

PMID: 37845683 PMC: 10577994. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-05233-6.

References
1.
Viana R, Vancini R, Silva W, Morais N, de Oliveira V, Andrade M . Comment on: Problematic online gaming and the COVID-19 pandemic - The role of exergames. J Behav Addict. 2021; 10(1):1-3. PMC: 8969849. DOI: 10.1556/2006.2021.00014. View

2.
Hansen B, Kolle E, Steene-Johannessen J, Dalene K, Ekelund U, Anderssen S . Monitoring population levels of physical activity and sedentary time in Norway across the lifespan. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018; 29(1):105-112. DOI: 10.1111/sms.13314. View

3.
McDonough D, Pope Z, Zeng N, Lee J, Gao Z . Retired Elite Athletes' Physical Activity, Physiological, and Psychosocial Outcomes During Single- and Double-Player Exergaming. J Strength Cond Res. 2019; 33(12):3220-3225. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003386. View

4.
Krarup K, Krarup H . The physiological and biochemical effects of gaming: A review. Environ Res. 2020; 184:109344. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109344. View

5.
Moholdt T, Weie S, Chorianopoulos K, Wang A, Hagen K . Exergaming can be an innovative way of enjoyable high-intensity interval training. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2017; 3(1):e000258. PMC: 5633750. DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2017-000258. View