» Articles » PMID: 35781861

Real-World Data on Pembrolizumab for Pretreated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Clinical Outcome and Relevance of the Lung Immune Prognostic Index

Overview
Journal Target Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Jul 5
PMID 35781861
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Pembrolizumab is licensed for the treatment of pre-treated and PD-L1 positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but response is heterogeneous. In this context, the Lung Immune Prognostic Index (LIPI) has been proposed as tool to prognosticate outcome.

Objective: To investigate the real-world efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in pre-treated NSCLC patients and the clinical utility of LIPI for patients' selection.

Patients And Methods: Patients with pre-treated NSCLC and PD-L1 ≥ 1% treated with pembrolizumab were included in this retrospective series. The LIPI was used to classify patients in 3 prognostics subgroups according to the pre-treatment dNLR (derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio) and LDH in blood. The prognostic impact of the LIPI on progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated with Cox regression. The combined effect of LIPI and other relevant prognostic factors was explored with multivariate regression.

Results: In total, 113 consecutive patients were included. Median (mPFS) and mOS was 4.3 (2.6-6.7) and 13.5 (10.3-17.7) months, respectively. Good-, intermediate-, and poor-LIPI was found in 54 (47.8%), 45 (39.8%), and 8 (7.1%) patients, respectively. Median PFS was 5.1 (2.8-9.1), 3.0 (2.5-6.8), and 1.4 (0.5-18.7) months, and mOS was 17.2 (12.0-26.4), 11.8 (8.4-17.1), and 3.7 (0.5-not calculable) months for good-, intermediate-, and poor-LIPI group, respectively. Patients with intermediate-LIPI and poor-LIPI had worse PFS versus good-LIPI, and statistically significant worse OS (p = 0.030 and p = 0.013, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, intermediate- versus good-LIPI (p = 0.190) was not independently associated to PFS or OS. Patients with both good-LIPI and high (≥ 50%) PD-L1 had better OS than all other subgroups defined by LIPI and PD-L1. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occurred in 47 (41.6%) patients (12.4% grade ≥ 3). In a time-varying analysis, irAEs were statistically associated with longer OS (HR 0.51, 0.31-0.84; p = 0.008).

Conclusion: In our series, the outcome of pembrolizumab in pre-treated NSCLC is consistent with the registration trial. Lung Immune Prognostic Index is a readily available tool able to prognosticate outcome, also in PD-L1-high patients. The positive association between irAEs and OS might aid decision making.

Citing Articles

Prognostic value of lung immune prognostic index in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: a meta-analysis.

Wang Y, Lei Y, Zheng D, Yang Y, Luo L, Li J Pathol Oncol Res. 2024; 30:1611773.

PMID: 38966280 PMC: 11222319. DOI: 10.3389/pore.2024.1611773.


Immune-related adverse events and their effects on survival outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Liang Y, Xu H, Liu F, Li L, Lin C, Zhang Y Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1281645.

PMID: 38887231 PMC: 11180722. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1281645.


Prognosis stratification of cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors through lung immune prognostic index: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Guo Y, Pan Y, Wan J, Gong B, Li Y, Kan X BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):523.

PMID: 38664760 PMC: 11047037. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12271-0.


Predictors of Immunotherapy Efficacy in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Lung Immune Prognostic Index and Immune-Related Toxicity.

Moratiel Pellitero A, Zapata Garcia M, Gascon Ruiz M, Arbones-Mainar J, Lastra Del Prado R, Isla D World J Oncol. 2024; 15(2):223-238.

PMID: 38545481 PMC: 10965262. DOI: 10.14740/wjon1790.


From data strategy to implementation to advance cancer research and cancer care: A French comprehensive cancer center experience.

Heudel P, Crochet H, Durand T, Zrounba P, Blay J PLOS Digit Health. 2023; 2(12):e0000415.

PMID: 38113207 PMC: 10729983. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000415.


References
1.
Shepherd F, Dancey J, Ramlau R, Mattson K, Gralla R, ORourke M . Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus best supportive care in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2000; 18(10):2095-103. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.10.2095. View

2.
Hanna N, Shepherd F, Fossella F, Pereira J, de Marinis F, von Pawel J . Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22(9):1589-97. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.163. View

3.
Reck M, Kaiser R, Mellemgaard A, Douillard J, Orlov S, Krzakowski M . Docetaxel plus nintedanib versus docetaxel plus placebo in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (LUME-Lung 1): a phase 3, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014; 15(2):143-55. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70586-2. View

4.
Garon E, Ciuleanu T, Arrieta O, Prabhash K, Syrigos K, Goksel T . Ramucirumab plus docetaxel versus placebo plus docetaxel for second-line treatment of stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer after disease progression on platinum-based therapy (REVEL): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2014; 384(9944):665-73. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60845-X. View

6.
Rittmeyer A, Barlesi F, Waterkamp D, Park K, Ciardiello F, von Pawel J . Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016; 389(10066):255-265. PMC: 6886121. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32517-X. View