» Articles » PMID: 35779099

Requirement of Preoperative Blood Typing for Cholecystectomy and Appendectomy: a Systematic Review

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2022 Jul 2
PMID 35779099
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Blood typing, or group and save (G&S) testing, is commonly performed prior to cholecystectomy and appendectomy in many hospitals. In order to determine whether G&S testing is required prior to these procedures, we set out to evaluate the relevant literature and associated rates of perioperative blood transfusion.

Methods: Studies from January 1990 to June 2021 assessing the requirement of preoperative G&S testing for elective or emergency cholecystectomy and appendectomy were retrieved from MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases. The search was performed on 6th July 2021 (PROSPERO registration number CRD42021267967). Number of patients, co-morbidities, operation performed, number of patients that underwent preoperative G&S testing, perioperative transfusion rates and financial costs were extracted.

Results: We initially screened 194 studies of which 15 retrospective studies, a total of 477,437 patients, specifically met the inclusion criteria. Ten studies reported on cholecystectomy, two studies on appendectomy and three studies included both procedures. Where reported, a total of 177,539/469,342 (37.8%) patients underwent preoperative G&S testing with a perioperative transfusion rate of 2.1% (range 0.0 to 2.1%). The main preoperative risk factors associated with perioperative blood transfusion identified include cardiovascular co-morbidity, coagulopathy, anaemia and haematological malignancy. All 15 studies concluded that routine G&S is not warranted.

Conclusion: The current evidence suggests that G&S is not necessarily required for all patients undergoing cholecystectomy or appendectomy. Having a targeted G&S approach would reduce delays in elective and emergency lists, reduce the burden on the blood transfusion service and have financial implications.

Citing Articles

Is Routine Group and Save Sampling Necessary for Emergency Laparoscopic Appendicectomy?.

Harrow S, Nadarajasundaram A Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e78086.

PMID: 39882197 PMC: 11774625. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.78086.


The Role of Group and Save Testing Prior to Emergency Laparoscopic Appendicectomy.

Chaudhari V, Mohammad H, Khan U Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e74898.

PMID: 39742180 PMC: 11686453. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.74898.


Assessment of routine pre-operative group and save testing in patients undergoing cholecystectomy: a retrospective cohort study.

OLeary L, Sherwood W, Fadel M, Barkeji M NIHR Open Res. 2024; 4:17.

PMID: 39473540 PMC: 11519620. DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13543.2.


The Necessity of Routine Pre-operative Group and Save Testing for Emergency Appendectomies.

Ibrahim B, Obayi E, Barghash M, Itaman U, Alkurdi Y, Johnson A Cureus. 2024; 15(12):e50032.

PMID: 38161570 PMC: 10757670. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.50032.

References
1.
Fong M, Urriza Rodriguez D, Elberm H, Berry D . Are Type and Screen Samples Routinely Necessary Before Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy?. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020; 25(2):447-451. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-020-04515-8. View

2.
Liberati A, Altman D, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche P, Ioannidis J . The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000100. PMC: 2707010. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100. View

3.
Sigman H, Fried G, Garzon J, HINCHEY E, Wexler M, Meakins J . Risks of blind versus open approach to celiotomy for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1993; 3(4):296-9. View

4.
Suuronen S, Niskanen L, Paajanen P, Paajanen H . Declining cholecystectomy rate during the era of statin use in Finland: a population-based cohort study between 1995 and 2009. Scand J Surg. 2013; 102(3):158-63. DOI: 10.1177/1457496913492463. View

5.
Hack-Adams N, King N, Ahuja M, M Higgs S . Optimising the Pre-Operative Investigative Work Up for Elective Surgical Patients. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2016; 4(1). PMC: 4693043. DOI: 10.1136/bmjquality.u206272.w2608. View