» Articles » PMID: 35774555

Offline Parietal Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation or Alpha Frequency Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Has No Effect on Visuospatial or Temporal Attention

Overview
Journal Front Neurosci
Date 2022 Jul 1
PMID 35774555
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Non-invasive brain stimulation is a growing field with potentially wide-ranging clinical and basic science applications due to its ability to transiently and safely change brain excitability. In this study we include two types of stimulation: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). Single session stimulations with either technique have previously been reported to induce changes in attention. To better understand and compare the effectiveness of each technique and the basis of their effects on cognition we assessed changes to both temporal and visuospatial attention using an attentional blink task and a line bisection task following offline stimulation with an intermittent theta burst (iTBS) rTMS protocol or 10 Hz tACS. Additionally, we included a novel rTMS stimulation technique, low-intensity (LI-)rTMS, also using an iTBS protocol, which uses stimulation intensities an order of magnitude below conventional rTMS. Animal models show that low-intensity rTMS modulates cortical excitability despite sub-action potential threshold stimulation. Stimulation was delivered in healthy participants over the right posterior parietal cortex (rPPC) using a within-subjects design ( = 24). Analyses showed no evidence for an effect of any stimulation technique on spatial biases in the line bisection task or on magnitude of the attentional blink. Our results suggests that rTMS and LI-rTMS using iTBS protocol and 10 Hz tACS over rPPC do not modulate performance in tasks assessing visuospatial or temporal attention.

References
1.
Vossen A, Gross J, Thut G . Alpha Power Increase After Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation at Alpha Frequency (α-tACS) Reflects Plastic Changes Rather Than Entrainment. Brain Stimul. 2015; 8(3):499-508. PMC: 4464304. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.12.004. View

2.
Benwell C, Learmonth G, Miniussi C, Harvey M, Thut G . Non-linear effects of transcranial direct current stimulation as a function of individual baseline performance: Evidence from biparietal tDCS influence on lateralized attention bias. Cortex. 2015; 69:152-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.05.007. View

3.
Vidal-Pineiro D, Martin-Trias P, Falcon C, Bargallo N, Clemente I, Valls-Sole J . Neurochemical Modulation in Posteromedial Default-mode Network Cortex Induced by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2015; 8(5):937-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.04.005. View

4.
Giglia G, Mattaliano P, Puma A, Rizzo S, Fierro B, Brighina F . Neglect-like effects induced by tDCS modulation of posterior parietal cortices in healthy subjects. Brain Stimul. 2011; 4(4):294-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.01.003. View

5.
Stewart L, Walsh V, Rothwell J . Motor and phosphene thresholds: a transcranial magnetic stimulation correlation study. Neuropsychologia. 2001; 39(4):415-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00130-5. View