» Articles » PMID: 35774016

Analysis of Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trials in the Presence of a Time-varying Treatment Effect

Overview
Journal Stat Med
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Public Health
Date 2022 Jul 1
PMID 35774016
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trials are typically analyzed using models that assume the full effect of the treatment is achieved instantaneously. We provide an analytical framework for scenarios in which the treatment effect varies as a function of exposure time (time since the start of treatment) and define the "effect curve" as the magnitude of the treatment effect on the linear predictor scale as a function of exposure time. The "time-averaged treatment effect" (TATE) and "long-term treatment effect" (LTE) are summaries of this curve. We analytically derive the expectation of the estimator resulting from a model that assumes an immediate treatment effect and show that it can be expressed as a weighted sum of the time-specific treatment effects corresponding to the observed exposure times. Surprisingly, although the weights sum to one, some of the weights can be negative. This implies that may be severely misleading and can even converge to a value of the opposite sign of the true TATE or LTE. We describe several models, some of which make assumptions about the shape of the effect curve, that can be used to simultaneously estimate the entire effect curve, the TATE, and the LTE. We evaluate these models in a simulation study to examine the operating characteristics of the resulting estimators and apply them to two real datasets.

Citing Articles

Designing stepped wedge trials to evaluate physical activity interventions in schools: methodological considerations.

Salway R, House D, Kent-Saisch S, Walker R, Emm-Collison L, Porter A Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025; 22(1):22.

PMID: 40001100 PMC: 11863484. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-025-01720-z.


Bayesian Hierarchical Penalized Spline Models for Immediate and Time-Varying Intervention Effects in Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trials.

Wu D, Park H, Grudzen C, Goldfeld K Stat Med. 2025; 44(5):e10304.

PMID: 39964677 PMC: 11835049. DOI: 10.1002/sim.10304.


Analysis of Cohort Stepped Wedge Cluster-Randomized Trials With Nonignorable Dropout via Joint Modeling.

Gasparini A, Crowther M, Hoogendijk E, Li F, Harhay M Stat Med. 2025; 44(5):e10347.

PMID: 39963907 PMC: 11833761. DOI: 10.1002/sim.10347.


How to achieve model-robust inference in stepped wedge trials with model-based methods?.

Wang B, Wang X, Li F Biometrics. 2024; 80(4).

PMID: 39499239 PMC: 11536888. DOI: 10.1093/biomtc/ujae123.


The fixed-effects model for robust analysis of stepped-wedge cluster trials with a small number of clusters and continuous outcomes: a simulation study.

Lee K, Cheung Y Trials. 2024; 25(1):718.

PMID: 39455982 PMC: 11515801. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08572-1.


References
1.
Kennedy-Shaffer L, de Gruttola V, Lipsitch M . Novel methods for the analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials. Stat Med. 2019; 39(7):815-844. PMC: 7247054. DOI: 10.1002/sim.8451. View

2.
Scott J, deCamp A, Juraska M, Fay M, B Gilbert P . Finite-sample corrected generalized estimating equation of population average treatment effects in stepped wedge cluster randomized trials. Stat Methods Med Res. 2014; 26(2):583-597. PMC: 4411204. DOI: 10.1177/0962280214552092. View

3.
Zhou X, Liao X, Spiegelman D . "Cross-sectional" stepped wedge designs always reduce the required sample size when there is no time effect. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017; 83:108-109. PMC: 5517056. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.12.011. View

4.
Thompson J, Davey C, Fielding K, Hargreaves J, Hayes R . Robust analysis of stepped wedge trials using cluster-level summaries within periods. Stat Med. 2018; 37(16):2487-2500. PMC: 6032886. DOI: 10.1002/sim.7668. View

5.
Kasza J, Hemming K, Hooper R, Matthews J, Forbes A . Impact of non-uniform correlation structure on sample size and power in multiple-period cluster randomised trials. Stat Methods Med Res. 2017; 28(3):703-716. DOI: 10.1177/0962280217734981. View