» Articles » PMID: 35771652

Skeletal and Dentoalveolar Effects of Slow Vs Rapid Activation Protocols of Miniscrew-supported Maxillary Expanders in Adolescents: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview
Journal Angle Orthod
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2022 Jun 30
PMID 35771652
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To compare between skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of slow and rapid activation of miniscrew-supported expanders.

Materials And Methods: A total of 30 patients were randomly allocated to two groups using block randomization and the allocation ratio 1:1. Both groups received maxillary expanders anchored using four miniscrews. Activation protocol was once every other day in the slow expansion (SME) group and twice daily in the rapid expansion (RME) group. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were obtained before expansion and after removal of the expanders. Transverse skeletal and dentoalveolar changes were measured using CBCT.

Results: A total of 12 patients in the SME group (mean age, 14.30 ± 1.37 years) and 12 patients in the RME group (mean age, 15.07 ± 1.59 years) were analyzed. RME showed significantly greater widening of the mid-palatal suture at the level of first molars (mean difference [SME - RME] = -0.61 mm), and a greater increase in right and left molar buccal inclination (mean difference= -3.83° and -2.03°, respectively). Percentage of skeletal expansion relative to the jackscrew opening was not significantly different between the groups. Palatal inflammation was evident following appliance removal. Miniscrew mobility and bending were observed with RME.

Conclusions: Both SME and RME were effective in correcting skeletal transverse maxillary deficiency. However, RME resulted in more buccal tipping of maxillary molars and in miniscrew failures and bending.

Citing Articles

Palatal Morphology After Treatment of Children With Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Using the Modified Twin-Block Appliance.

Duan J, Li X, Zhang F, Xia W, Li B Int Dent J. 2024; 74(5):1120-1128.

PMID: 38582717 PMC: 11561501. DOI: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.03.007.


A Retrospective Histological Study on Palatal and Gingival Mucosa Changes during a Rapid Palatal Expansion Procedure.

Bud E, Vlasa A, Pacurar M, Matei A, Bud A, Szoke A Biomedicines. 2023; 11(12).

PMID: 38137467 PMC: 10740776. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11123246.


Temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: a bibliometric analysis of the 50 most-cited articles from 2012 to 2022.

Ferrillo M, Nucci L, Gallo V, Bruni A, Montrella R, Fortunato L Angle Orthod. 2023; 93(5):591-602.

PMID: 37200455 PMC: 10575636. DOI: 10.2319/010923-18.1.


Do patient-reported outcomes of miniscrew-supported maxillary expansion in adolescent patients differ between slow and rapid activation protocol?.

ElNaghy R, Al-Qawasmi R, Hasanin M Evid Based Dent. 2023; 24(1):28-29.

PMID: 36890253 DOI: 10.1038/s41432-023-00858-8.


Dimensional changes of upper airway after slow vs rapid miniscrew-supported maxillary expansion in adolescents: a cone-beam computed tomography study.

Yacout Y, El-Harouni N, Madian A BMC Oral Health. 2022; 22(1):529.

PMID: 36424571 PMC: 9686034. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02581-9.


References
1.
Cantarella D, Dominguez-Mompell R, Mallya S, Moschik C, Pan H, Miller J . Changes in the midpalatal and pterygopalatine sutures induced by micro-implant-supported skeletal expander, analyzed with a novel 3D method based on CBCT imaging. Prog Orthod. 2017; 18(1):34. PMC: 5663987. DOI: 10.1186/s40510-017-0188-7. View

2.
Lagravere M, Carey J, Heo G, Toogood R, Major P . Transverse, vertical, and anteroposterior changes from bone-anchored maxillary expansion vs traditional rapid maxillary expansion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137(3):304.e1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.09.016. View

3.
Rungcharassaeng K, Caruso J, Kan J, Kim J, Taylor G . Factors affecting buccal bone changes of maxillary posterior teeth after rapid maxillary expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 132(4):428.e1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.02.052. View

4.
Lee H, Bayome M, Ahn C, Kim S, Kim K, Mo S . Stress distribution and displacement by different bone-borne palatal expanders with micro-implants: a three-dimensional finite-element analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2012; 36(5):531-40. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjs063. View

5.
ZIMRING J, ISAACSON R . FORCES PRODUCED BY RAPID MAXILLARY EXPANSION. 3. FORCES PRESENT DURING RETENTION. Angle Orthod. 1965; 35:178-86. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1965)035<0178:FPBRME>2.0.CO;2. View