» Articles » PMID: 35768791

Mutations of 1p Genes Do Not Consistently Abrogate Tumor Suppressor Functions in 1p-intact Neuroblastoma

Abstract

Background: Deletion of 1p is associated with poor prognosis in neuroblastoma, however selected 1p-intact patients still experience poor outcomes. Since mutations of 1p genes may mimic the deleterious effects of chromosomal loss, we studied the incidence, spectrum and effects of mutational variants in 1p-intact neuroblastoma.

Methods: We characterized the 1p status of 325 neuroblastoma patients, and correlated the mutational status of 1p tumor suppressors and neuroblastoma candidate genes with survival outcomes among 100 1p-intact cases, then performed functional validation of selected novel variants of 1p36 genes identified from our patient cohort.

Results: Among patients with adverse disease characteristics, those who additionally had 1p deletion had significantly worse overall survival. Among 100 tumor-normal pairs sequenced, somatic mutations of 1p tumor suppressors KIF1Bβ and CHD5 were most frequent (2%) after ALK and ATRX (8%), and BARD1 (3%). Mutations of neuroblastoma candidate genes were associated with other synchronous mutations and concurrent 11q deletion (P = 0.045). In total, 24 of 38 variants identified were novel and predicted to be deleterious or pathogenic. Functional validation identified novel KIF1Bβ I1355M variant as a gain-of-function mutation with increased expression and tumor suppressive activity, correlating with indolent clinical behavior; another novel variant CHD5 E43Q was a loss-of-function mutation with decreased expression and increased long-term cell viability, corresponding with aggressive disease characteristics.

Conclusions: Our study showed that chromosome 1 gene mutations occurred frequently in 1p-intact neuroblastoma, but may not consistently abrogate the function of bonafide 1p tumor suppressors. These findings may augment the evolving model of compounding contributions of 1p gene aberrations toward tumor suppressor inactivation in neuroblastoma.

Citing Articles

Chromosome 1p36 candidate gene ZNF436 predicts the prognosis of neuroblastoma: a bioinformatic analysis.

Wang H, Wang X, Xu L Ital J Pediatr. 2023; 49(1):145.

PMID: 37904225 PMC: 10617224. DOI: 10.1186/s13052-023-01549-x.


Comparing Tribbles Homolog 3 (TRIB3) Protein Expression Levels with Clinicopathological Characteristics and Survival Among Neuroblastoma Patients.

Baran B, Sanlav G, Kizmazoglu D, Ozsengezer S, Aktas S, Altun Z Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2023; 17:11795549231199926.

PMID: 37744426 PMC: 10515557. DOI: 10.1177/11795549231199926.

References
1.
Maris J, Guo C, Blake D, White P, Hogarty M, Thompson P . Comprehensive analysis of chromosome 1p deletions in neuroblastoma. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2001; 36(1):32-6. DOI: 10.1002/1096-911X(20010101)36:1<32::AID-MPO1009>3.0.CO;2-0. View

2.
Schramm A, Koster J, Assenov Y, Althoff K, Peifer M, Mahlow E . Mutational dynamics between primary and relapse neuroblastomas. Nat Genet. 2015; 47(8):872-7. DOI: 10.1038/ng.3349. View

3.
Latorre V, Diskin S, Diamond M, Zhang H, Hakonarson H, Maris J . Replication of neuroblastoma SNP association at the BARD1 locus in African-Americans. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012; 21(4):658-63. PMC: 3319325. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0830. View

4.
Liu Z, Lam N, Wang E, Virden R, Pawel B, Attiyeh E . Identification of CASZ1 NES reveals potential mechanisms for loss of CASZ1 tumor suppressor activity in neuroblastoma. Oncogene. 2016; 36(1):97-109. PMC: 5140774. DOI: 10.1038/onc.2016.179. View

5.
Li S, Fell S, Surova O, Smedler E, Wallis K, Chen Z . The 1p36 Tumor Suppressor KIF 1Bβ Is Required for Calcineurin Activation, Controlling Mitochondrial Fission and Apoptosis. Dev Cell. 2016; 36(2):164-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.12.029. View