» Articles » PMID: 35768650

Meaningful Improvement in General Health Outcomes with Guselkumab Treatment for Psoriatic Arthritis: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 Results from a Phase 3 Study

Abstract

Objective: The Phase 3 DISCOVER-1 study of guselkumab is the first randomized controlled trial to use Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures to assess the effects of treatment on general health outcomes in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Methods: Patients (N = 381) with active PsA were randomized 1:1:1 to guselkumab 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W); guselkumab 100 mg at Week 0, Week 4, then every 8 weeks (Q8W); or placebo with Week 24 crossover to guselkumab Q4W. The PROMIS-29 Profile contains four items for each of seven domains (anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, and social participation) and one pain-intensity item. Raw domain scores are converted to standardized T-scores, with norms based on a US general population mean of 50 (1 standard deviation (SD) = 10). T-score changes of ≥ 5 are considered clinically meaningful. Least-squares mean PROMIS-29 T-score changes from baseline to Week 24 and Week 52 were summarized for the guselkumab and placebo groups; nominal p-values comparing results between guselkumab and placebo were calculated at Week 24 using a mixed model for repeated measures. The proportions of patients who achieved clinically meaningful improvement in PROMIS-29 T-scores were also summarized at Week 24 and Week 52; nominal p-values comparing results between guselkumab and placebo were calculated at Week 24 using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test.

Results: In the DISCOVER-1 patient population, mean PROMIS-29 T-scores at baseline were ~ 1 SD worse for physical function and pain interference and were numerically worse for social participation, fatigue, and sleep disturbance compared with the US general population. At Week 24, mean PROMIS-29 T-scores improved in guselkumab-treated patients, approaching US population norms; T-scores continued to improve through Week 52. Significantly higher proportions of patients in both guselkumab treatment arms (31-52% across domains) had clinically meaningful improvements in pain interference, fatigue, physical function, sleep, and social participation at Week 24 versus placebo (all nominal p ≤ 0.05).

Conclusion: In patients with active PsA, guselkumab treatment provided clinically meaningful reductions in fatigue and pain and improvement in physical function and social participation, as measured by the PROMIS-29 Profile. These improvements were maintained through 1 year.

Clinicaltrials: GOV: Registration number, NCT03162796; Submission date 19 May 2017.

Citing Articles

Sleep Problems in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: A Systematic Literature Review and Metaanalysis.

Grant C, Woodbury M, Skougaard M, Boldsen J, Ogdie A, Klerman E J Rheumatol. 2023; .

PMID: 37127321 PMC: 10618413. DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2022-1169.

References
1.
Ritchlin C, Helliwell P, Boehncke W, Soriano E, Hsia E, Kollmeier A . Guselkumab, an inhibitor of the IL-23p19 subunit, provides sustained improvement in signs and symptoms of active psoriatic arthritis: 1 year results of a phase III randomised study of patients who were biologic-naïve or TNFα inhibitor-experienced. RMD Open. 2021; 7(1). PMC: 7880108. DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001457. View

2.
Katz P, Kannowski C, Sun L, Michaud K . Estimation of Minimally Important Differences and Patient Acceptable Symptom State Scores for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference Short Form in Rheumatoid Arthritis. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2020; 2(6):320-329. PMC: 7301876. DOI: 10.1002/acr2.11141. View

3.
Beaumont J, Davis E, Curtis J, Cella D, Yun H . Meaningful Change Thresholds for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue and Pain Interference Scores in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2021; 48(8):1239-1242. DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.200990. View

4.
Esaa F, Prezzano J, Pentland A, Wolf J . The utility of PROMIS domain measures in dermatologic care. Arch Dermatol Res. 2020; 313(1):17-24. DOI: 10.1007/s00403-020-02074-1. View

5.
Husted J, Cook R, Farewell V, Gladman D . Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000; 53(5):459-68. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00206-1. View