» Articles » PMID: 35767056

A Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Versus Radiologists in the Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodules Using Ultrasonography: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Date 2022 Jun 29
PMID 35767056
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Thyroid nodules are common. Ultrasonography (US) is the first investigation for thyroid nodules. Artificial Intelligence (AI) is widely integrated into medical diagnosis to provide additional information. The primary objective of this study was to accumulate the pooled sensitivity and specificity between all available AI and radiologists using thyroid US imaging. The secondary objective was to compare AI's diagnostic performance to that of radiologists.

Materials And Methods: A systematic review meta-analysis. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library data were searched for studies from inception until June 11, 2020.

Results: Twenty five studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of AI were 0.86 (95% CI 0.81-0.91) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.73-0.83), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of radiologists were 0.85 (95% CI 0.80-0.89) and 0.82 (95% CI 0.77-0.86), respectively. The accuracy of AI and radiologists is equivalent in terms of AUC [AI 0.89 (95% CI 0.86-0.92), radiologist 0.91 (95% CI 0.88-0.93)]. The diagnostic odd ratio (DOR) between AI 23.10 (95% CI 14.20-37.58) and radiologists 27.12 (95% CI 17.45-42.16) had no statistically significant difference (P = 0.56). Meta-regression analysis revealed that Deep Learning AI had significantly greater sensitivity and specificity than classic machine learning AI (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: AI demonstrated comparable performance to radiologists in diagnosing benign and malignant thyroid nodules using ultrasonography. Additional research to establish its equivalency should be conducted.

Citing Articles

Thyroid nodules: diagnosis and management.

Grani G, Sponziello M, Filetti S, Durante C Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2024; 20(12):715-728.

PMID: 39152228 DOI: 10.1038/s41574-024-01025-4.


The Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Classification of Thyroid Nodules: An Update.

Ludwig M, Ludwig B, Mikula A, Biernat S, Rudnicki J, Kaliszewski K Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(3).

PMID: 36765671 PMC: 9913834. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030708.

References
1.
Xu L, Gao J, Wang Q, Yin J, Yu P, Bai B . Computer-Aided Diagnosis Systems in Diagnosing Malignant Thyroid Nodules on Ultrasonography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Eur Thyroid J. 2020; 9(4):186-193. PMC: 7445671. DOI: 10.1159/000504390. View

2.
Shin I, Kim Y, Han K, Lee E, Kim H, Shin J . Application of machine learning to ultrasound images to differentiate follicular neoplasms of the thyroid gland. Ultrasonography. 2020; 39(3):257-265. PMC: 7315296. DOI: 10.14366/usg.19069. View

3.
Whiting P, Rutjes A, Westwood M, Mallett S, Deeks J, Reitsma J . QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011; 155(8):529-36. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009. View

4.
Xia S, Yao J, Zhou W, Dong Y, Xu S, Zhou J . A computer-aided diagnosing system in the evaluation of thyroid nodules-experience in a specialized thyroid center. World J Surg Oncol. 2019; 17(1):210. PMC: 6898946. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-019-1752-z. View

5.
Ko S, Lee J, Yoon J, Na H, Hong E, Han K . Deep convolutional neural network for the diagnosis of thyroid nodules on ultrasound. Head Neck. 2019; 41(4):885-891. DOI: 10.1002/hed.25415. View