» Articles » PMID: 35766617

Comparison of Novel Martin/Hopkins and Sampson Equations for Calculation of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Diabetic Patients

Overview
Date 2022 Jun 29
PMID 35766617
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The accurate determination of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is important to reach guideline-recommended LDL-C concentrations and to reduce adverse cardiovascular outcomes in diabetic patients. The commonly used Friedewald equation (LDL-Cf), gives inaccurate results in diabetic patients due to accompanying diabetic dyslipidemia. Recently two new equations - Martin/Hopkins (LDL-Cmh) and Sampson (LDL-Cs) - were developed to improve the accuracy of LDL-C estimation, but data are insufficient to suggest the superiority of one equation over the other one.

Objective: The present study compared the accuracy and clinical usefulness of novel Martin/Hopkins and Sampson equations in diabetic patients.

Methods: This study included 402 patients with diabetes. Patients' cardiovascular risk and LDL-C targets were calculated per European guidelines. Calculated LDL-Cmh, LDL-Cs, and LDL-Cf concentrations were compared with direct LDL-C concentration (LDL-Cd) to test agreement between these equations and LDL-Cd. A p-value <0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.

Results: Both LDL-Cmh and LDL-Cs had a better agreement with LDL-Cd as compared to LDL-Cf, but no statistical differences were found among novel equations for agreement with LDL-Cd (Cronbach's alpha 0.955 for both, p=1). Likewise, LDL-Cmh and LDL-Cs showed a similar degree of agreement with LDL-Cd in determining whether a patient was in a guideline-recommended LDL-C target (96.3% for LDL-Cmh and 96.0% for LDL-Cs), which were marginally better than LDL-Cf (94.6%). In patients with a triglyceride concentration >400 mg/dl, agreement with LDL-Cd was poor, regardless of the method used.

Conclusion: Martin/Hopkins and Sampson's equations show a similar accuracy for calculating LDL-C concentrations in patients with diabetes, and both equations were marginally better than the Friedewald equation.

Citing Articles

The clinical impact of estimating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) using different equations in the general population.

Lam R, Manemann S, Seehusen K, Remaley A, St Sauver J, Jiang R Lipids Health Dis. 2024; 23(1):210.

PMID: 38965543 PMC: 11223329. DOI: 10.1186/s12944-024-02188-9.


Assessing the Practical Differences in LDL-C Estimates Calculated by Friedewald, Martin/Hopkins, or NIH Equation 2: An Observation Cross-Sectional Study.

Wang I, Rahman M, Hou S, Lin H J Lipid Atheroscler. 2023; 12(3):252-266.

PMID: 37800109 PMC: 10548185. DOI: 10.12997/jla.2023.12.3.252.


Analysis of low-density lipoprotein in diabetic patients using the Martin/Hopkins and Sampson equationsReply.

Nascimento C, Mendes R, Botelho Filho C, Barbosa R, Tenorio P Arq Bras Cardiol. 2023; 120(5):e20220859.

PMID: 37255129 PMC: 10348386. DOI: 10.36660/abc.20220859.


Concordance of LDL-C Estimating Equations with Direct Enzymatic Measurement in Diabetic and Prediabetic Subjects.

Bolat S, Zararsiz G, Dogan K, Kochan N, Yerlitas S, Cephe A J Clin Med. 2023; 12(10).

PMID: 37240676 PMC: 10219201. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12103570.


Friedewald, Martin/Hopkins, or Sampson/NIH: Which is the Best Method to Estimate LDL-Cholesterol?.

Cesena F Arq Bras Cardiol. 2022; 119(2):234-235.

PMID: 35946684 PMC: 9363056. DOI: 10.36660/abc.20220455.

References
1.
Miller W, Myers G, Sakurabayashi I, Bachmann L, Caudill S, Dziekonski A . Seven direct methods for measuring HDL and LDL cholesterol compared with ultracentrifugation reference measurement procedures. Clin Chem. 2010; 56(6):977-86. PMC: 4687457. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.142810. View

2.
Rim J, Lee Y, Lee M, Kim H, Choi J, Lee B . Comparison and Validation of 10 Equations Including a Novel Method for Estimation of LDL-cholesterol in a 168,212 Asian Population. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95(14):e3230. PMC: 4998773. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003230. View

3.
FRIEDEWALD W, Levy R, Fredrickson D . Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972; 18(6):499-502. View

4.
Haffner S, Lehto S, Ronnemaa T, Pyorala K, Laakso M . Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339(4):229-34. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199807233390404. View

5.
Saely C, Drexel H . Is type 2 diabetes really a coronary heart disease risk equivalent?. Vascul Pharmacol. 2013; 59(1-2):11-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.vph.2013.05.003. View