Comparison of Novel Martin/Hopkins and Sampson Equations for Calculation of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Diabetic Patients
Overview
Affiliations
Background: The accurate determination of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is important to reach guideline-recommended LDL-C concentrations and to reduce adverse cardiovascular outcomes in diabetic patients. The commonly used Friedewald equation (LDL-Cf), gives inaccurate results in diabetic patients due to accompanying diabetic dyslipidemia. Recently two new equations - Martin/Hopkins (LDL-Cmh) and Sampson (LDL-Cs) - were developed to improve the accuracy of LDL-C estimation, but data are insufficient to suggest the superiority of one equation over the other one.
Objective: The present study compared the accuracy and clinical usefulness of novel Martin/Hopkins and Sampson equations in diabetic patients.
Methods: This study included 402 patients with diabetes. Patients' cardiovascular risk and LDL-C targets were calculated per European guidelines. Calculated LDL-Cmh, LDL-Cs, and LDL-Cf concentrations were compared with direct LDL-C concentration (LDL-Cd) to test agreement between these equations and LDL-Cd. A p-value <0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.
Results: Both LDL-Cmh and LDL-Cs had a better agreement with LDL-Cd as compared to LDL-Cf, but no statistical differences were found among novel equations for agreement with LDL-Cd (Cronbach's alpha 0.955 for both, p=1). Likewise, LDL-Cmh and LDL-Cs showed a similar degree of agreement with LDL-Cd in determining whether a patient was in a guideline-recommended LDL-C target (96.3% for LDL-Cmh and 96.0% for LDL-Cs), which were marginally better than LDL-Cf (94.6%). In patients with a triglyceride concentration >400 mg/dl, agreement with LDL-Cd was poor, regardless of the method used.
Conclusion: Martin/Hopkins and Sampson's equations show a similar accuracy for calculating LDL-C concentrations in patients with diabetes, and both equations were marginally better than the Friedewald equation.
Lam R, Manemann S, Seehusen K, Remaley A, St Sauver J, Jiang R Lipids Health Dis. 2024; 23(1):210.
PMID: 38965543 PMC: 11223329. DOI: 10.1186/s12944-024-02188-9.
Wang I, Rahman M, Hou S, Lin H J Lipid Atheroscler. 2023; 12(3):252-266.
PMID: 37800109 PMC: 10548185. DOI: 10.12997/jla.2023.12.3.252.
Nascimento C, Mendes R, Botelho Filho C, Barbosa R, Tenorio P Arq Bras Cardiol. 2023; 120(5):e20220859.
PMID: 37255129 PMC: 10348386. DOI: 10.36660/abc.20220859.
Bolat S, Zararsiz G, Dogan K, Kochan N, Yerlitas S, Cephe A J Clin Med. 2023; 12(10).
PMID: 37240676 PMC: 10219201. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12103570.
Friedewald, Martin/Hopkins, or Sampson/NIH: Which is the Best Method to Estimate LDL-Cholesterol?.
Cesena F Arq Bras Cardiol. 2022; 119(2):234-235.
PMID: 35946684 PMC: 9363056. DOI: 10.36660/abc.20220455.