» Articles » PMID: 35764996

Transthoracic, Thoracoabdominal, and Transabdominal Surgical Approaches for Gastric Cardia Adenocarcinomas: a Survival Evaluation Based on a Cohort of 7103 Patients

Abstract

Background: This study compared the survival outcomes of different surgical approaches to determine the optimal approach for gastric cardia adenocarcinoma (GCA) and aimed to standardize the surgical treatment guidelines for GCA.

Methods: A total of 7103 patients with GCA were enrolled from our previously established gastric cardia and esophageal carcinoma databases. In our database, when the epicenter of the tumor was at or within 2 cm distally from the esophagogastric junction, the adenocarcinoma was considered to originate from the cardia and was considered a Siewert type 2 cancer. The main criteria for the enrolled patients included treatment with radical surgery, no radio- or chemotherapy before the operation, and detailed clinicopathological information. Follow-up was mainly performed by telephone or through home interviews. According to the medical records, the surgical approaches included transthoracic, thoracoabdominal, and transabdominal approaches. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression models were applied to correlate the surgical approach with survival in patients with GCA.

Results: There were marked differences in age and tumor stage among the patients who underwent the three surgical approaches (P < 0.001). Univariate analysis showed that survival was related to sex, age, tumor stage, and N stage (P < 0.001 for all). Cox regression model analysis revealed that thoracoabdominal approach (P < 0.001) and transabdominal approach (P < 0.001) were significant risk factors for poor survival. GCA patients treated with the transthoracic approach had the best survival (5-year survival rate of 53.7%), and survival varied among the different surgical approaches for different tumor stages.

Conclusion: Thoracoabdominal approach and transabdominal approach were shown to be poor prognostic factors. Patients with (locally advanced) GCA may benefit from the transthoracic approach. Further prospective randomized clinical trials are necessary.

Citing Articles

Comparison of proximal gastrectomy with tubular esophagogastric anastomosis and total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction of Siewert type II/III at stage II.

Zhang Z, Zhao T, Wang Y, Xue F, Pu Y, Du Q BMC Surg. 2024; 24(1):382.

PMID: 39614266 PMC: 11607818. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02685-9.


Effect of different surgical approaches on the survival and safety of Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zheng H, Yin X, Pan T, Tao X, Xu X, Li Z BMC Cancer. 2023; 23(1):1130.

PMID: 37990193 PMC: 10662530. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11640-5.


Essential updates 2021/2022: Perioperative and surgical treatments for gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer.

Yanagimoto Y, Kurokawa Y, Doki Y Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2023; 7(5):698-708.

PMID: 37663969 PMC: 10472390. DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12711.


Neural network-based prognostic predictive tool for gastric cardiac cancer: the worldwide retrospective study.

Li W, Zhang M, Cai S, Wu L, Li C, He Y BioData Min. 2023; 16(1):21.

PMID: 37464415 PMC: 10353146. DOI: 10.1186/s13040-023-00335-z.


Establishment and validation of a prognostic nomogram for postoperative patients with gastric cardia adenocarcinoma: A study based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and a Chinese cohort.

Wang L, Ge J, Feng L, Wang Z, Wang W, Han H Cancer Med. 2023; 12(12):13111-13122.

PMID: 37132269 PMC: 10315777. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5994.


References
1.
Wang Y, Huang C, Wang J, Zheng C, Li P, Xie J . Survival and surgical outcomes of cardiac cancer of the remnant stomach in comparison with primary cardiac cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2014; 12:21. PMC: 3906884. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-21. View

2.
Nigro J, Demeester S, Hagen J, DeMeester T, Peters J, Kiyabu M . Node status in transmural esophageal adenocarcinoma and outcome after en bloc esophagectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999; 117(5):960-8. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5223(99)70377-6. View

3.
Mauvais F, Sauvanet A, Maylin V, Paye F, Sa Cunha A, Dugue L . [Treatment of adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus and cardia: resection with or without thoracotomy?]. Ann Chir. 2000; 125(3):222-30. DOI: 10.1016/s0001-4001(00)00136-7. View

4.
Goldfaden D, Orringer M, Appelman H, Kalish R . Adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and gastric cardia. Comparison of results of transhiatal esophagectomy and thoracoabdominal esophagogastrectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1986; 91(2):242-7. View

5.
Barbour A, Rizk N, Gonen M, Tang L, Bains M, Rusch V . Adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: influence of esophageal resection margin and operative approach on outcome. Ann Surg. 2007; 246(1):1-8. PMC: 1899203. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000255563.65157.d2. View