Possibilities and Challenges when Using Synthetic Computed Tomography in an Adaptive Carbon-ion Treatment Workflow

Overview

Journal Z Med Phys

Specialty Radiology

Date 2022 Jun 28

PMID 35764469

Authors

Barbara Knausl

Peter Kuess

Markus Stock

Dietmar Georg

Piero Fossati

Petra Georg

Lukas Zimmermann

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background And Purpose: Anatomical surveillance during ion-beam therapy is the basis for an effective tumor treatment and optimal organ at risk (OAR) sparing. Synthetic computed tomography (sCT) based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can replace the X-ray based planning CT (X-rayCT) in photon radiotherapy and improve the workflow efficiency without additional imaging dose. The extension to carbon-ion radiotherapy is highly challenging; complex patient positioning, unique anatomical situations, distinct horizontal and vertical beam incidence directions, and limited training data are only few problems. This study gives insight into the possibilities and challenges of using sCTs in carbon-ion therapy.

Materials And Methods: For head and neck patients immobilised with thermoplastic masks 30 clinically applied actively scanned carbon-ion treatment plans on 15 CTs comprising 60 beams were analyzed. Those treatment plans were re-calculated on MRI based sCTs which were created employing a 3D U-Net. Dose differences and carbon-ion spot displacements between sCT and X-rayCT were evaluated on a patient specific basis.

Results: Spot displacement analysis showed a peak displacement by 0.2 cm caused by the immobilisation mask not measurable with the MRI. 95.7% of all spot displacements were located within 1 cm. For the clinical target volume (CTV) the median D agreed within -0.2% (-1.3 to 1.4%), while the median D differed up to 4.2% (-1.3 to 25.3%) comparing the dose distribution on the X-rayCT and the sCT. OAR deviations depended strongly on the position and the dose gradient. For three patients no deterioration of the OAR parameters was observed. Other patients showed large deteriorations, e.g. for one patient D of the chiasm differed by 28.1%.

Conclusion: The usage of sCTs opens several new questions, concluding that we are not ready yet for an MR-only workflow in carbon-ion therapy, as envisaged in photon therapy. Although omitting the X-rayCT seems unfavourable in the case of carbon-ion therapy, an sCT could be advantageous for monitoring, re-planning, and adaptation.

Citing Articles

"Under the hood": artificial intelligence in personalized radiotherapy.

Gianoli C, De Bernardi E, Parodi K BJR Open. 2024; 6(1):tzae017.

PMID: 39104573 PMC: 11299549. DOI: 10.1093/bjro/tzae017.

A review of the clinical introduction of 4D particle therapy research concepts.

Knausl B, Belotti G, Bertholet J, Daartz J, Flampouri S, Hoogeman M Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024; 29:100535.

PMID: 38298885 PMC: 10828898. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100535.

Synthetic CTs for MRI-only brain RT treatment: integration of immobilization systems.

Masitho S, Grigo J, Brandt T, Lambrecht U, Szkitsak J, Weiss A Strahlenther Onkol. 2023; 199(8):739-748.

PMID: 37285037 PMC: 10361877. DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02090-w.

Synthetic CT in Carbon Ion Radiotherapy of the Abdominal Site.

Parrella G, Vai A, Nakas A, Garau N, Meschini G, Camagni F Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(2).

PMID: 36829745 PMC: 9951997. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10020250.

References

Paddick I . A simple scoring ratio to index the conformity of radiosurgical treatment plans. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 2001; 93 Suppl 3:219-22. DOI: 10.3171/jns.2000.93.supplement. View

Maspero M, Bentvelzen L, Savenije M, Guerreiro F, Seravalli E, Janssens G . Deep learning-based synthetic CT generation for paediatric brain MR-only photon and proton radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2020; 153:197-204. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.09.029. View

Neppl S, Landry G, Kurz C, Hansen D, Hoyle B, Stocklein S . Evaluation of proton and photon dose distributions recalculated on 2D and 3D Unet-generated pseudoCTs from T1-weighted MR head scans. Acta Oncol. 2019; 58(10):1429-1434. DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2019.1630754. View

Dinkla A, Florkow M, Maspero M, Savenije M, Zijlstra F, Doornaert P . Dosimetric evaluation of synthetic CT for head and neck radiotherapy generated by a patch-based three-dimensional convolutional neural network. Med Phys. 2019; 46(9):4095-4104. DOI: 10.1002/mp.13663. View

Spadea M, Maspero M, Zaffino P, Seco J . Deep learning based synthetic-CT generation in radiotherapy and PET: A review. Med Phys. 2021; 48(11):6537-6566. DOI: 10.1002/mp.15150. View

Malouff T, Mahajan A, Krishnan S, Beltran C, Seneviratne D, Trifiletti D . Carbon Ion Therapy: A Modern Review of an Emerging Technology. Front Oncol. 2020; 10:82. PMC: 7010911. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00082. View

Li Y, Kubota Y, Tashiro M, Ohno T . Value of Three-Dimensional Imaging Systems for Image-Guided Carbon Ion Radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel). 2019; 11(3). PMC: 6468538. DOI: 10.3390/cancers11030297. View

Zimmermann L, Buschmann M, Herrmann H, Heilemann G, Kuess P, Goldner G . An MR-only acquisition and artificial intelligence based image-processing protocol for photon and proton therapy using a low field MR. Z Med Phys. 2021; 31(1):78-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2020.10.004. View

Siversson C, Nordstrom F, Nilsson T, Nyholm T, Jonsson J, Gunnlaugsson A . Technical Note: MRI only prostate radiotherapy planning using the statistical decomposition algorithm. Med Phys. 2015; 42(10):6090-7. DOI: 10.1118/1.4931417. View

10.

Zechner A, Ziegler I, Hug E, Lutgendorf-Caucig C, Stock M . Evaluation of the inter- and intrafraction displacement for head patients treated at the particle therapy centre MedAustron based on the comparison of different commercial immobilisation devices. Z Med Phys. 2021; 32(1):39-51. PMC: 9948876. DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2021.01.007. View

11.

van der Heide U, Frantzen-Steneker M, Astreinidou E, Nowee M, van Houdt P . MRI basics for radiation oncologists. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2019; 18:74-79. PMC: 6630156. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2019.04.008. View

12.

de Muinck Keizer D, van der Voort van Zyp J, de Groot-van Breugel E, Raaymakers B, Lagendijk J, de Boer H . On-line daily plan optimization combined with a virtual couch shift procedure to address intrafraction motion in prostate magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2021; 19:90-95. PMC: 8327343. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2021.07.010. View

13.

Stock M, Georg D, Ableitinger A, Zechner A, Utz A, Mumot M . The technological basis for adaptive ion beam therapy at MedAustron: Status and outlook. Z Med Phys. 2017; 28(3):196-210. DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2017.09.007. View

14.

Kazemifar S, McGuire S, Timmerman R, Wardak Z, Nguyen D, Park Y . MRI-only brain radiotherapy: Assessing the dosimetric accuracy of synthetic CT images generated using a deep learning approach. Radiother Oncol. 2019; 136:56-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.03.026. View

15.

Schneider U, Pedroni E, Lomax A . The calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning. Phys Med Biol. 1996; 41(1):111-24. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/41/1/009. View

16.

Padilla-Cabal F, Resch A, Georg D, Fuchs H . Implementation of a dose calculation algorithm based on Monte Carlo simulations for treatment planning towards MRI guided ion beam therapy. Phys Med. 2020; 74:155-165. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.04.027. View

17.

Placidi L, Bolsi A, Lomax A, Schneider R, Malyapa R, Weber D . Effect of Anatomic Changes on Pencil Beam Scanned Proton Dose Distributions for Cranial and Extracranial Tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016; 97(3):616-623. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.11.013. View

18.

Bhattacharyya T, Koto M, Ikawa H, Hayashi K, Hagiwara Y, Makishima H . First prospective feasibility study of carbon-ion radiotherapy using compact superconducting rotating gantry. Br J Radiol. 2019; 92(1103):20190370. PMC: 6849685. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190370. View

19.

Olch A, Gerig L, Li H, Mihaylov I, Morgan A . Dosimetric effects caused by couch tops and immobilization devices: report of AAPM Task Group 176. Med Phys. 2014; 41(6):061501. DOI: 10.1118/1.4876299. View

20.

Gillmann C, Lomax A, Weber D, Jakel O, Karger C . Dose-response curves for MRI-detected radiation-induced temporal lobe reactions in patients after proton and carbon ion therapy: Does the same RBE-weighted dose lead to the same biological effect?. Radiother Oncol. 2018; 128(1):109-114. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.01.018. View