» Articles » PMID: 35763094

Sensitivity of Virtual Non-contrast Dual-energy CT Urogram for Detection of Urinary Calculi: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Eur Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2022 Jun 28
PMID 35763094
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To determine the sensitivity of dual-energy (DE) virtual non-contrast computed tomography (vNCT), generated from the excretory phase of a CT urogram, compared to true non-contrast CT (tNCT) for the detection of urinary calculi.

Methods: A search of multiple medical literature databases was performed using predetermined search terms. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, and bias risk was assessed by two independent reviewers using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS) tool. Collated estimates of sensitivity were generated, and sources of heterogeneity were identified and reviewed.

Results: Thirteen studies (1760 patients; 1740 urinary calculi) were included for sensitivity assessment. Pooled sensitivity for urinary calculi on vNCT was 78.1% (95% CI: 70.2 to 85.0%); however, heterogeneity between studies was very high (I = 92.0%). Sources of heterogeneity between studies were explored through subgroup analysis by categorising studies according to slice thickness (≥ 2 mm and < 2 mm), use of oral hydration, and use of intravenous furosemide. Pooled sensitivity for detection of urinary calculi on vNCT for studies that used oral hydration and < 2 mm slice thickness was 92.2% (95% CI: 89.5 to 94.5%). Pooled specificity was not performed as true negatives were not reported in most studies. Potential sources of bias were identified in included studies.

Conclusion: vNCT demonstrated a moderate pooled sensitivity compared to tNCT for the detection of urinary calculi in split bolus CT urogram protocols. However, subgroup analysis suggests higher sensitivity when employing oral hydration and < 2 mm slice thickness or increment.

Key Points: • vNCT demonstrated moderate pooled sensitivity for the detection of urinary calculi in split bolus CT urogram protocols. • Subgroup analysis suggested higher sensitivity with oral hydration and < 2 mm slice thickness or increment.

Citing Articles

Urinary calculi composition and its correlation with sex, age, calculi site, urine pH and underlying diseases: a retrospective study.

Li H, Peng S, Jiang H, Wu G, Chen N Am J Transl Res. 2025; 16(12):7688-7697.

PMID: 39822493 PMC: 11733361. DOI: 10.62347/CVWT8813.


Virtual Non-Contrast versus True Native in Photon-Counting CT: Stability of Density of Upper Abdominal Organs and Vessels.

Haag F, Emmrich S, Hertel A, Rink J, Norenberg D, Schoenberg S Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 38893656 PMC: 11171968. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14111130.


Dual-Energy CT in Oncologic Imaging.

Foti G, Ascenti G, Agostini A, Longo C, Lombardo F, Inno A Tomography. 2024; 10(3):299-319.

PMID: 38535766 PMC: 10975567. DOI: 10.3390/tomography10030024.


Cornerstones of CT urography: a shared document by the Italian board of urogenital radiology.

Ascenti G, Cicero G, Cardone G, Bertelli E, Papa M, Ciccone V Radiol Med. 2023; 128(5):601-611.

PMID: 37027091 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-023-01623-8.


Detection and size measurements of kidney stones on virtual non-contrast reconstructions derived from dual-layer computed tomography in an ex vivo phantom setup.

Reimer R, Zaytoun H, Klein K, Sonnabend K, Lennartz S, Zopfs D Eur Radiol. 2022; 33(4):2995-3003.

PMID: 36422646 PMC: 10017605. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-09261-w.

References
1.
Sewell J, Katz D, Shoshany O, Love C . Urolithiasis - Ten things every general practitioner should know. Aust Fam Physician. 2017; 46(9):648-652. View

2.
Nolte-Ernsting C, Cowan N . Understanding multislice CT urography techniques: Many roads lead to Rome. Eur Radiol. 2006; 16(12):2670-86. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0386-z. View

3.
Lokken R, Sadow C, Silverman S . Diagnostic yield of CT urography in the evaluation of young adults with hematuria. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 198(3):609-15. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.7296. View

4.
Bhojani N, Paonessa J, El Tayeb M, Williams Jr J, Hameed T, Lingeman J . Sensitivity of Noncontrast Computed Tomography for Small Renal Calculi With Endoscopy as the Gold Standard. Urology. 2018; 117:36-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.03.041. View

5.
Karlo C, Gnannt R, Winklehner A, Fischer M, Donati O, Eberli D . Split-bolus dual-energy CT urography: protocol optimization and diagnostic performance for the detection of urinary stones. Abdom Imaging. 2013; 38(5):1136-43. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-013-9992-9. View