» Articles » PMID: 35760906

Freezing Revisited: Coordinated Autonomic and Central Optimization of Threat Coping

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2022 Jun 27
PMID 35760906
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Animals have sophisticated mechanisms for coping with danger. Freezing is a unique state that, upon threat detection, allows evidence to be gathered, response possibilities to be previsioned and preparations to be made for worst-case fight or flight. We propose that - rather than reflecting a passive fear state - the particular somatic and cognitive characteristics of freezing help to conceal overt responses, while optimizing sensory processing and action preparation. Critical for these functions are the neurotransmitters noradrenaline and acetylcholine, which modulate neural information processing and also control the sympathetic and parasympathetic branches of the autonomic nervous system. However, the interactions between autonomic systems and the brain during freezing, and the way in which they jointly coordinate responses, remain incompletely explored. We review the joint actions of these systems and offer a novel computational framework to describe their temporally harmonized integration. This reconceptualization of freezing has implications for its role in decision-making under threat and for psychopathology.

Citing Articles

Single-unit activity in the anterior claustrum during memory retrieval after trace fear conditioning.

Park S, Sohn K, Yoon D, Lee J, Choi S PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0318307.

PMID: 39932965 PMC: 11813112. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318307.


Sex differences in blood pressure responses of Pekin ducks to sound stimuli and conspecific vocalizations.

Schober J, Wesley S, Taylor I, Ault B, Plue C, Bergman M Poult Sci. 2024; 104(2):104735.

PMID: 39740496 PMC: 11750539. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104735.


The dopaminergic system mediates the lateral habenula-induced autonomic cardiovascular responses.

Sato Y, Matsumoto M, Koganezawa T Front Physiol. 2024; 15:1496726.

PMID: 39640253 PMC: 11617519. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1496726.


Molecular Impact of Sublethal Spinetoram Exposure on Honeybee () Larval and Adult Transcriptomes.

Vasamsetti B, Kim J, Chon K, Kim B, Yoon C, Hwang S Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(22).

PMID: 39595991 PMC: 11593601. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252211923.


Social threat avoidance depends on action-outcome predictability.

Sequestro M, Serfaty J, Grezes J, Mennella R Commun Psychol. 2024; 2(1):100.

PMID: 39462095 PMC: 11512816. DOI: 10.1038/s44271-024-00152-y.


References
1.
Blanchard D, Griebel G, Pobbe R, Blanchard R . Risk assessment as an evolved threat detection and analysis process. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010; 35(4):991-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.10.016. View

2.
Fanselow M, Lester L, Helmstetter F . Changes in feeding and foraging patterns as an antipredator defensive strategy: a laboratory simulation using aversive stimulation in a closed economy. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988; 50(3):361-74. PMC: 1338904. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1988.50-361. View

3.
McNaughton N, Corr P . A two-dimensional neuropsychology of defense: fear/anxiety and defensive distance. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004; 28(3):285-305. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.03.005. View

4.
Mobbs D, Kim J . Neuroethological studies of fear, anxiety, and risky decision-making in rodents and humans. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2018; 5:8-15. PMC: 6034691. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.06.005. View

5.
Bach D, Dayan P . Algorithms for survival: a comparative perspective on emotions. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017; 18(5):311-319. DOI: 10.1038/nrn.2017.35. View