» Articles » PMID: 35760857

A Clinically Relevant Model of Focal Embolic Cerebral Ischemia by Thrombus and Thrombolysis in Rhesus Monkeys

Overview
Journal Nat Protoc
Specialties Biology
Pathology
Science
Date 2022 Jun 27
PMID 35760857
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Over decades of research into the treatment of stroke, nearly all attempts to translate experimental treatments from discovery in cells and rodents to use in humans have failed. The prevailing belief is that it might be necessary to pretest pharmacological neuroprotection in higher-order brains, especially those of nonhuman primates (NHPs). Over the past few years, chemical thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy have been established as the standard of care for ischemic stroke in patients. The spotlight is now shifting towards emphasizing both focal ischemia and subsequent reperfusion in developing a clinically relevant stroke model in NHPs. This protocol describes an embolic model of middle cerebral artery occlusion in adult rhesus monkeys. An autologous clot is combined with a microcatheter or microwire through endovascular procedures, and reperfusion is achieved through local intra-artery thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator. These NHP models formed relatively stable infarct sizes, delivered predictable reperfusion and survival outcomes, and recapitulated key characteristics of patients with ischemic stroke as observed on MRI images and behavioral assays. Importantly, treated animals could survive 30 d after the surgery for post-stroke neurologic deficit analyses. Thus far, this model has been used in several translational studies. Here we describe in detail the teamwork necessary for developing stroke models of NHPs, including the preoperation preparations, endovascular surgery, postoperation management and histopathological analysis. The model can be established by the following procedures over a 45-d period, including preparation steps (14 d), endovascular operation (1 d) and evaluation steps (30 d).

Citing Articles

Ischemic Stroke Induces ROS Accumulation, Maladaptive Mitophagy, and Neuronal Apoptosis in Minipigs.

Chen J, Bie Y, Guan Y, Liu W, Xu F, Liu T J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2024; 34(12):2648-2661.

PMID: 39631782 PMC: 11729333. DOI: 10.4014/jmb.2409.09003.


Role of phosphorylated Y1252, Y1336 and Y1472 on NR2B subunits in hypoxia tolerance of neuronal cell in vitro.

Liu X, Lu X, Jiang S, Gao B, Wang P, Zhu H Exp Brain Res. 2024; 243(1):12.

PMID: 39621125 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-024-06969-7.


Therapeutic strategies targeting the NLRP3‑mediated inflammatory response and pyroptosis in cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury (Review).

Duan W, Wang X, Ma Y, Sheng Z, Dong H, Zhang L Mol Med Rep. 2024; 29(3).

PMID: 38275110 PMC: 10835666. DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2024.13170.


"No-reflow" phenomenon in acute ischemic stroke.

Zhang Y, Jiang M, Gao Y, Zhao W, Wu C, Li C J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2023; 44(1):19-37.

PMID: 37855115 PMC: 10905637. DOI: 10.1177/0271678X231208476.

References
1.
Walker G, Jadhav A, Jovin T . Assessing the efficacy of endovascular therapy in stroke treatments: updates from the new generation of trials. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2017; 15(10):757-766. DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2017.1365600. View

2.
Goyal M, Menon B, van Zwam W, Dippel D, Mitchell P, Demchuk A . Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet. 2016; 387(10029):1723-31. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X. View

3.
Sommer C . Ischemic stroke: experimental models and reality. Acta Neuropathol. 2017; 133(2):245-261. PMC: 5250659. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-017-1667-0. View

4.
Shi L, Rocha M, Leak R, Zhao J, Bhatia T, Mu H . A new era for stroke therapy: Integrating neurovascular protection with optimal reperfusion. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2018; 38(12):2073-2091. PMC: 6282224. DOI: 10.1177/0271678X18798162. View

5.
OCollins V, Macleod M, Donnan G, Horky L, van der Worp B, Howells D . 1,026 experimental treatments in acute stroke. Ann Neurol. 2006; 59(3):467-77. DOI: 10.1002/ana.20741. View