» Articles » PMID: 35757616

Protection of Workers Exposed to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields: A Perspective on Open Questions in the Context of the New ICNIRP 2020 Guidelines

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2022 Jun 27
PMID 35757616
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Workers in occupational settings are usually exposed to numerous sources of electromagnetic fields (EMF) and to different physical agents. Risk assessment for industrial workplaces concerning EMF is not only relevant to operators of devices or machinery emitting EMF, but also to support-workers, bystanders, service and maintenance personnel, and even visitors. Radiofrequency EMF guidelines published in 2020 by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) may also be indirectly applied to assess risks emerging from EMF sources at workplaces by technical standards or legislation. To review the applicability and adequacy to assess exposure to EMF in occupational settings in the European Union, the most current ICNIRP guidelines on radiofrequency EMF are reviewed. Relevant ICNIRP fundamentals and principles are introduced, followed by practical aspects of exposure assessment. To conclude, open questions are formulated pointing out gaps between the guidelines' principles and occupational practice, such as the impact of hot and humid environments and physical activity or controversies around ICNIRPS's reduction factors in view of assessment uncertainty in general. Thus, the article aims to provide scientific policy advisors, labor inspectors, or experts developing standards with a profound understanding about ICNIRP guidelines' applicability to assess hazards related to radiofrequency EMF in occupational settings.

Citing Articles

Occupational Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields-Different from General Public Exposure and Laboratory Studies.

Hansson Mild K, Mattsson M, Jeschke P, Israel M, Ivanova M, Shalamanova T Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(16).

PMID: 37623138 PMC: 10454245. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20166552.

References
1.
Hirata A, Kojima M, Kawai H, Yamashiro Y, Watanabe S, Sasaki H . Acute dosimetry and estimation of threshold-inducing behavioral signs of thermal stress in rabbits at 2.45-GHz microwave exposure. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010; 57(5):1234-42. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2009.2038896. View

2.
. Guidelines on limits of exposure to static magnetic fields. Health Phys. 2009; 96(4):504-14. DOI: 10.1097/01.HP.0000343164.27920.4a. View

3.
Mattei E, Censi F, Calcagnini G, Falsaperla R . Workers with Cardiac AIMD Exposed to EMF: Methods and Case Studies for Risk Analysis in the Framework of the European Regulations. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(18). PMC: 8470458. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18189709. View

4.
Zubrzak B, Bienkowski P, Cala P . Mitigation measures of electromagnetic field exposure in the vicinity of high frequency welders. Med Pr. 2017; 68(6):693-703. DOI: 10.13075/mp.5893.00619. View

5.
Eriksson A, Mild K . Radiofrequency electromagnetic leakage fields from plastic welding machines. Measurements and reducing measures. J Microw Power Electromagn Energy. 1985; 20(2):95-107. DOI: 10.1080/16070658.1985.11720296. View