Attachment Security Priming Delayed Negative Information-Related Attentional Disengagement Among Anxiously Attached Individuals: Evidence From Behavioral and Functional MRI Experiments

Overview

Journal Front Psychol

Date 2022 Jun 27

PMID 35756230

Authors

Beiyi Wang

Xinyuan Peng

Fei Gao

Kaihua Zhang

Jianxin Zhang

Lili Wu

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Although attachment security has been found to attenuate people's experience of unpleasant information, how it modulates the attentional process toward such information remains unknown. The present study examined this issue by employing the dot-probe task in functional MRI. After completing the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised questionnaire (ECR-R), 39 participants were asked to complete the dot-probe task in two conditions: the attachment security priming condition and neutral priming condition. The behavioral results revealed that individuals with high level of attachment anxiety exhibited larger attention disengagement from negative traits in the security priming condition than in the control condition. Correspondingly, the brain regions involved in attention regulation and shifting, such as the posterior cingulate and bilateral parietal area, were less activated among high anxiously attached individuals in the security priming condition. These results suggest a role of attachment security priming in regulating the emotional response in anxiously attached individuals during the attentional stage.

References

Fernandes-Magalhaes R, Ferrera D, Pelaez I, Martin-Buro M, Carpio A, De Lahoz M . Neural correlates of the attentional bias towards pain-related faces in fibromyalgia patients: An ERP study using a dot-probe task. Neuropsychologia. 2022; 166:108141. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.108141. View

Chapman A, Devue C, Grimshaw G . Fleeting reliability in the dot-probe task. Psychol Res. 2017; 83(2):308-320. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-017-0947-6. View

Norman L, Lawrence N, Iles A, Benattayallah A, Karl A . Attachment-security priming attenuates amygdala activation to social and linguistic threat. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014; 10(6):832-9. PMC: 4448028. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsu127. View

Wu L, Gu R, Shi X, Wang B, Zhang J . Boosting attachment security to cope with threats: Behavioral and ERPs findings. Int J Psychophysiol. 2020; 149:8-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.01.003. View

Mikulincer M, Shaver P, Rom E . The effects of implicit and explicit security priming on creative problem solving. Cogn Emot. 2011; 25(3):519-31. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2010.540110. View

Gillath O, Karantzas G, Romano D, Karantzas K . Attachment Security Priming: A Meta-Analysis. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2022; 26(3):183-241. DOI: 10.1177/10888683211054592. View

VAN Rooijen R, Ploeger A, Kret M . The dot-probe task to measure emotional attention: A suitable measure in comparative studies?. Psychon Bull Rev. 2017; 24(6):1686-1717. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1224-1. View

Coan J, Beckes L, Gonzalez M, Maresh E, Brown C, Hasselmo K . Relationship status and perceived support in the social regulation of neural responses to threat. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017; 12(10):1574-1583. PMC: 5647795. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsx091. View

Bowlby J . Attachment and loss: retrospect and prospect. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1982; 52(4):664-678. DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1982.tb01456.x. View

10.

Dykas M, Cassidy J . Attachment and the processing of social information across the life span: theory and evidence. Psychol Bull. 2011; 137(1):19-46. DOI: 10.1037/a0021367. View

11.

Dewitte M, Koster E, De Houwer J, Buysse A . Attentive processing of threat and adult attachment: a dot-probe study. Behav Res Ther. 2007; 45(6):1307-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2006.11.004. View

12.

Frankenstein U, Richter W, McIntyre M, Remy F . Distraction modulates anterior cingulate gyrus activations during the cold pressor test. Neuroimage. 2001; 14(4):827-36. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0883. View

13.

Master S, Eisenberger N, Taylor S, Naliboff B, Shirinyan D, Lieberman M . A picture's worth: partner photographs reduce experimentally induced pain. Psychol Sci. 2009; 20(11):1316-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02444.x. View

14.

Torrence R, Troup L . Event-related potentials of attentional bias toward faces in the dot-probe task: A systematic review. Psychophysiology. 2017; 55(6):e13051. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13051. View

15.

Bartz J, Lydon J . Close relationships and the working self-concept: implicit and explicit effects of priming attachment on agency and communion. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004; 30(11):1389-401. DOI: 10.1177/0146167204264245. View

16.

Small D, Gitelman D, Gregory M, Nobre A, Parrish T, Mesulam M . The posterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortex mediate the anticipatory allocation of spatial attention. Neuroimage. 2003; 18(3):633-41. DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(02)00012-5. View

17.

Yuan J, Zhang Q, Cui L . Disgust face captures more attention in individuals with high social anxiety when cognitive resources are abundant: Evidence from N2pc. Neuropsychologia. 2020; 151:107731. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107731. View

18.

Dewitte M . Adult attachment and attentional inhibition of interpersonal stimuli. Cogn Emot. 2011; 25(4):612-25. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2010.508683. View

19.

Karreman A, Vingerhoets A, Bekker M . Attachment styles and secure base priming in relation to emotional reactivity after frustration induction. Cogn Emot. 2018; 33(3):428-441. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1458704. View

20.

Anderson N . Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1968; 9(3):272-9. DOI: 10.1037/h0025907. View