» Articles » PMID: 35754742

APOBEC Mutagenesis is Low in Most Types of Non-B DNA Structures

Overview
Journal iScience
Publisher Cell Press
Date 2022 Jun 27
PMID 35754742
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

While somatic mutations are known to be enriched in genome regions with non-canonical DNA secondary structure, the impact of particular mutagens still needs to be elucidated. Here, we demonstrate that in human cancers, the APOBEC mutagenesis is not enriched in direct repeats, mirror repeats, short tandem repeats, and G-quadruplexes, and even decreased below its level in B-DNA for cancer samples with very high APOBEC activity. In contrast, we observe that the APOBEC-induced mutational density is positively associated with APOBEC activity in inverted repeats (cruciform structures), where the impact of cytosine at the 3'-end of the hairpin loop is substantial. Surprisingly, the APOBEC-signature mutation density per TC motif in the single-stranded DNA of a G-quadruplex (G4) is lower than in the four-stranded part of G4 and in B-DNA. The APOBEC mutagenesis, as well as the UV-mutagenesis in melanoma samples, are absent in Z-DNA regions, owing to the depletion of their mutational signature motifs.

Citing Articles

Structural underpinnings of mutation rate variations in the human genome.

Liu Z, Hassan Samee M Nucleic Acids Res. 2023; 51(14):7184-7197.

PMID: 37395403 PMC: 10415140. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkad551.


Inverted repeats in the monkeypox virus genome are hot spots for mutation.

Dobrovolna M, Brazda V, Warner E, Bidula S J Med Virol. 2022; 95(1):e28322.

PMID: 36400742 PMC: 10100261. DOI: 10.1002/jmv.28322.

References
1.
Lawrence M, Stojanov P, Polak P, Kryukov G, Cibulskis K, Sivachenko A . Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes. Nature. 2013; 499(7457):214-218. PMC: 3919509. DOI: 10.1038/nature12213. View

2.
Lu S, Wang G, Bacolla A, Zhao J, Spitser S, Vasquez K . Short Inverted Repeats Are Hotspots for Genetic Instability: Relevance to Cancer Genomes. Cell Rep. 2015; 10(10):1674-1680. PMC: 6013304. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.039. View

3.
Salter J, Bennett R, Smith H . The APOBEC Protein Family: United by Structure, Divergent in Function. Trends Biochem Sci. 2016; 41(7):578-594. PMC: 4930407. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2016.05.001. View

4.
Shi K, Carpenter M, Banerjee S, Shaban N, Kurahashi K, Salamango D . Structural basis for targeted DNA cytosine deamination and mutagenesis by APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2016; 24(2):131-139. PMC: 5296220. DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.3344. View

5.
Nik-Zainal S, Alexandrov L, Wedge D, Van Loo P, Greenman C, Raine K . Mutational processes molding the genomes of 21 breast cancers. Cell. 2012; 149(5):979-93. PMC: 3414841. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.024. View